Commons:Ընտրյալ պատկերների թեկնածուներ

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ընտրյալ պատկերների թեկնածուներ էջն այլ լեզուներով.

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | հայերեն | +/−

Shortcut: COM:FPC Եթե Դուք կարծում եք, որ գտել կամ ստեղծել եք պատկեր, որն արժանի է դառնալու ընտրյալ, խնդրում ենք այն ավելացնել Թեկնածուներ բաժնում։ Եթե 15 օրվա ընթացքում Ձեր առաջարկն ընդունվի համայնքի կողմից, ապա պատկերը կստանա ընտրյալ տիտղոս։ Խնդրում ենք ուշադրություն դարձնել, որ «Ընտրյալ պատկերն» ուղղակիորեն կապ չունի Օրվա պատկերի հետ։

Թեկնածուներ[edit]

Քվեարկելու կամ նոր թեկնածու առաջադրելու համար, անցեք այս հղումով։

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Sunflower and a bee.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 19:17:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Cala Rajada na Ferradura escultura Joan Bennàssar-1371.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 16:45:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img71 Maçka Gondola.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 14:10:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Maçka Gondola in Istanbul

File:Smoking, Bo-Kaap, Cape Town (P1060001).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 09:03:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Man with baseball cap and tattoos smoking a cigarette outside a coffeeshop in Bo-Kaap, Cape Town
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 09:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MB-one (talk) 09:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special --Nexo20 (talk) 16:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This image doesn't work for me, unfortunately. The scene is pedestrian, the lone figure looks a little out of focus well before getting to 100%, the shop behind them is largely obscured and fairly gloomy, and the block wall framing it all is not pleasing the eye. --Bobulous (talk) 19:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Image:Kanadagans auf dem Raakmoorteich im Naturschutzgebiet Raakmoor.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 08:40:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Yes, saturated colors and the blacks are too intense -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support, pending any edits per Aristeas' point above. I really like how the goose is framed by that filigree of foliage, a growing trunk or two, a fallen trunk and the reflections. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Blown highlights (chest) -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Mode Gakuen Cocoon Tower in the evening with blue sky Tokyo Japan.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 06:21:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mode Gakuen Cocoon Tower in the evening with blue sky Tokyo Japan

File:Collina presso Nagasaki, bozzetto di Alexandre Bailly, Marcel Jambon per Madama Butterfly (1906) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON000079 - Restoration.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 03:41:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Act I set design from the original production of Puccini's Madama Butterfly
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Alexandre Bailly and Marcel Jambon - restored and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info One of the first restorations - I think - from the recent collaboration with the Archivo Storico Ricordi. One issue: I'm pretty sure - and have sources to confirm - that it's actually Marcel Jambon - at least in modern spelling: back in the early 1900s it as a lot more common to change name spellings for different countries. I'm checking with the Wikimedian in Residence about that. It shouldn't matter at all, but would mean that this page and the file page will move to reflect that if it checks out. I'm listing by initials in the meantime. Edit:Yep. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support That's quite nice. I'm kind of astonished that someone would do such a nice watercolor of a stage design. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:360° panoramas Estonian University of Life Sciences, research.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 22:07:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

360° view on the research greenhouse of the Estonian University of Life Sciences
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Lauri Veerde - uploaded by Eesti Maaülikool - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 22:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 22:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support First class. There is only a stitching error at the yellow sticking tape at the roof, but this is minimal. -- -donald- (talk) 06:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 07:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very eye catching. Sharp throughout the central areas, and pleasingly smooth in the areas unavoidably distorted by the 180° view. Well exposed despite the variety of lighting, and rich with interesting textures. --Bobulous (talk) 19:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Kehtna Kutsehariduskeskus 005-kokad pano.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 22:06:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

360° view on the kitchen of the training restaurant of the Kehtna Vocational Education Centre
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Lauri Veerde - uploaded & nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 22:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 22:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Awesome. High educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing to look at with the 360° viewer. Technically the weak side is a high level of noise in the 2D version, but considering the huge resolution (18,384 × 9,192 pixels), for an interior shot where the moving subjects are rather sharp and the DoF generous, I think 1600 ISO is forgivable. Very interesting document -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perfect. -- -donald- (talk) 06:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I wish I could create such a spectacular panoramic! MartinD (talk) 07:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really impressive, also really good image quality. --Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 15:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Absolutely brilliant. A fascinating scene which takes several minutes to fully explore. It's well exposed, and has nice bursts of colour in amongst the chrome. The image is surprisingly noisy at 100%, but by the time the image is stretched to 100% it would be absolutely huge (nearly seven [4K 34-inch] monitors high and more than seven wide) so I see no real problem there. I can easily imagine seeing this in the Picture Of The Day box on the main page. --Bobulous (talk) 19:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Rutherford Hill Wine Cave-1351.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 20:46:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tasting room in the wine cave of Rutherford Hill Winery in Napa County, California

File:St Mary le Strand Church from balcony, London, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 14:39:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St Mary le Strand
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#London
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info With its decorative Italianate interior inspired by the work of Roman sculptors such as Luigi Fontana, St Mary le Strand is one of London's most unusual and interesting churches (still more for being located in the middle of a traffic island). Constructed between 1714 and 1724, its Baroque styling and plastered ceiling were highly controversial for an English church. There is a more conventional pew-level view but I think this view from the balcony is better. created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well balanced tones, given the range of lighting levels. Rich colours, and a very intricate and detailed venue. --Bobulous (talk) 20:29, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice composition, although the cutoff of the nearest chandelier is unfortunate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 02:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 15:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:SOB Re 456 Weissenbachviadukt Degersheim.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 13:58:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voralpenexpress cross the Wissbach viaduct near Degersheim

File:Bloem van gevlekt havikskruid (Hieracium maculatum). 02-09-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 04:41:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Reichstagsgebäude, Berlin-Mitte, 170402, ako.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 17:58:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reichstag building from the north-east
  • Understandable, but my argument would be we already have good FPs where you can see the dome. I nominated this picture because it's something a little different. Cmao20 (talk) 16:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Moshe Ganbash - Shiviti - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 16:45:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shiviti

File:Iglesia de San Carlos Borromeo, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 164-166 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 10:12:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Night view of the facade of St. Charles Church (Karlskirche), Vienna, Austria.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks, much better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg official SCOTUS portrait.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 00:06:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Steve Petteway uploaded by Gage - nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 00:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ezarateesteban 00:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Of course I see why you nominated this, with RBG having just passed away, but I think it's not an outstanding portrait in terms of image quality. There is quite a lot of colour noise and a large amount of JPEG artefacting which is a shame for a photo that is not especially large. For me it would be better to wait until emotions have died down a little over this sad event and see if there are better photos of Ms Ginsburg available. Cmao20 (talk) 01:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose RIP RBG, but not a great portrait of her. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not an outstanding portrait. --Gnosis (talk) 00:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Garzweiler surface mine Bucket-wheel excavator 2019 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 19:58:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Arne Müseler - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not sure how I feel about the photo, overall, but I'm definitely feeling like I want a wider crop on the right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Dramatic photo although there is a bit of barrel distortion. Cmao20 (talk) 01:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 08:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Weak oppose The subject is original and the composition good but the quality is clearly below FP level. It's too grainy (visiblem above all in the sky), lacks some sharpness and needs some perspective adjustments to get verticals vertical. I'd change my vote if the issues are successfully addressed Poco a poco (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Looks like a top-down view to me. Doesn't make sense to fix the verticals in that case (I got the same remark in this nomination). Looking at the machine at full size, it's really tack sharp. Shot with an Hasselblad at 100 ISO. Apart from a very very little noise in the sky, I really don't see why the quality would be "clearly below FP" -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:26, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Indeed, the image quality looks fine to me. The grain is pretty minimal and not a big deal. And the excavator itself is really sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 17:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I was confused by this comment, thought it looked rather crappy for a high-class medium format camera – until I realized that that "Hasselblad" is the 1″ sensor on-board camera of the Mavic 2 Pro. Now it makes sense. Actually looks pretty good for a drone shot. --El Grafo (talk) 15:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I didn't like this shot the first several times I looked at its thumbnail. But on filling the screen with it, it does keep drawing the eye to the dozens of nested structures hidden within. And to my eye the detail on the main body of the machine is crispy even at 100%. The ancillary body to the right is softer but still offers enough detail to show off yet more structures within this beast of a machine. I like the parallel bands of colour, and the textures in the sandy layer. So I've changed my mind: this does feel like a striking image. --Bobulous (talk) 20:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MartinD (talk) 07:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Bridge at Makhtesh Ramon (40582).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 16:54:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A bridge on a cliff overlooking the Makhtesh Ramon crater in Israel
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#Israel
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A bridge along a cliff path, looking out to Makhtesh Ramon in the Mitzpe Ramon desert. all by — Rhododendrites talk |  16:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Rhododendrites talk |  16:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 21:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really nice light. Cmao20 (talk) 01:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 08:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrei (talk) 08:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not the nicest bridge I've ever seen but the scene, compo and light are nice Poco a poco (talk) 10:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support it looks like a apocalyptic scene --Wilfredor (talk) 17:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I keep coming back to this image, but I just can't get it to work for me. The bridge and walkway invite the question: what are they there for, where do they go? And the image doesn't answer that. The shot is sharp and well exposed, but the scene just doesn't fit together for me. --Bobulous (talk) 20:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I understand that you're looking for an answer from the image, but I'll add an answer in text form anyway: this is along the Israel National Trail at the edge of Makhtesh Ramon. Basically a cliffside path. The bridge, if I recall correctly, only serves to take you to the little lookout area on the other side of it (the little area pictured). It was entirely optional, which I was glad for because it was old and missing planks and bowing in the middle and kind of scary. So the answers to "what is it there for" and "where does it go" are there... they're just not very interesting. :) Mainly I just liked the scene/composition. — Rhododendrites talk |  20:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral What a pity that the first pole is cut off (when the bridge is the main theme as the title says) --Llez (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Squirrel watching over the coast in La Jolla (70350).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 14:41:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Point La Jolla and Boomer Beach watched over by a ground squirrel in La Jolla, California
  • Only because I distracted him. :) — Rhododendrites talk |  22:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support We can see the squirrel's eye, so I think it's OK. Nice idea for a picture. Cmao20 (talk) 01:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Latzfonser Kreuz mit Dolomiten.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 12:48:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Place of pilgrimage above Klausen in the Sarntal Alps. In the background the Dolomites

File:Ceiling of golden Iwan at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

vault of Safavid kiosk in fin garden , iran

File:Clapham Lodge.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 19:26:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Clapham Lodge amid the gentle light of a crisp December afternoon.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by User:Bobulous - uploaded by User:Bobulous - nominated by Bobulous -- Bobulous (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bobulous (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good composition. --Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A 3/4 backlit shot can often be quite effective, but here the stone wall blocks the composition and casts an undesirable shadow on the foreground pavement. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Welcome to FPC (as far as I know, i haven't seen you nominate before). I like the shot but I think it is for me a bit more QI than FP. The subject is IMO not really that outstanding and for a building that isn't that naturally impressive I would only support a photo shot under excellent light or really outstanding composition. I actually like the composition, but I think the light is a little bit less than ideal - per KoH the shadows caused by the backlighting are not that attractive for me. There is also a little bit of blue chromatic aberration in the branches at the top, though this is easily fixable and not the reason for my oppose. Please, keep trying at FPC - this is not too far off the standard. Cmao20 (talk) 00:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
    • @King of Hearts, Cmao20: Thank you for your reviews. The blurring of the branches at the very top of the image is not caused by CA, but by the extreme edge of a shifted lens (a Canon TS-E 24mm mk II, very possibly shifted to the maximum to give a 12mm rise). I don't believe that such loss of resolution can be fixed in post (but I am hoping Canon will soon release a newer model which exhibits this effect less severely). I did wonder if the backlighting would put off some people, but decided to nominate because my eye keeps getting caught by the soft glow of the building face even though it's in shade and competing with areas lit by direct sunlight. If anyone is interested, I could offer an alternative crop which removes most of the road, but I kept it originally because I liked the long shadows made by the gate in the low sun. --Bobulous (talk) 18:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I’m not at all sold on the composition, sorry. At least, I’d entirely crop out the foreground road. Then, I’d love to see more of the tree on the left, as a counterweight to the one on the right. --Kreuzschnabel 21:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Jacques Cartier 1851-1852.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:55:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jacques Cartier 1851-1852

File:Funeral for a friend.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Black clay folk art from Mexico depicting skeletons. Photo taken from a private collection in San Miguel Allende, Mexico. Arrangement by me. -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Next time you could take two pictures to prevent the DoF problem --Wilfredor (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Copyright of the figurines? It is clearly a derivative work. Renata3 (talk) 01:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Where is the manufacturer \ artist information? Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose unless we have that.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 12:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A striking scene and mix of colour amid monochrome, with a beautiful mix of tones. --Bobulous (talk) 19:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Great idea with the multiple leading lines towards the top of the mountain. I do wish, however, that the closest pole on the right didn't intersect the mountain; a little forward (to get past it) or backward (to make it smaller in the frame) would do the trick. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Composition and colour work really well for me. Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely, great light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 10:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Bobulous and KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 20:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Buidhe (talk) 00:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Passageway - Funchal 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 12:06:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Passageway, Rua de Santa Maria 62, Funchal
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Other
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love it --Wilfredor (talk) 12:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice pic - finding beauty in decay. Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak Support Nice (it reminds me that composition) but underexposed in my view. Even the background is not so bright - Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I don't think it's comparable with that composition. The "dark" wall is not an external facade like in the other picture you mention but the back wall of a passage. This windowless passage is very dark. I had to brighten it up a bit, in the original shot the wall was even darker. The background is a narrow inner courtyard, surrounded by high walls with no direct light (and not a large park; it was a sunny day when the picture was taken). --Llez (talk) 01:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Both compositions are comparable. Not the same images, but two centered compositions with round door in the wall, and vegetation behind. (And this is the aspect I like).
  • Now of course I notice the camera is located in a darker room. Still, overall the image is divided into two parts: 1) One very dark foreground 2) One grey background. And just a tiny luminous area at the top of the stairs. 90% of the surface is too dark. You're saying there was no direct light in this narrow courtyard, due to tall walls, and yes, unfortunately that's visible: the exposure is not well set in my view. Sorry but same problem as here before it was fixed. You can increase quite a lot the light of the whole image and create a more appealing appearance -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20. I would try Basile’s hint, but I already like the photo as it is. --Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I did my best. But I have put the original raw file online, perhaps someone tries to improve the picture even more, I didn't succeed. --Llez (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Just add +0.6 exposure in Lightroom and that's done IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I tried it, but then is too much noise in the darker part. Could you try it and upload the result in the folder of the link? --Llez (talk) 17:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Sure, ✓ Done You may want to adjust the noise level with the 2nd version (obtained with Topaz DeNoise AI) -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Many thanks, I uploaded the version improved by you --Llez (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice shot but could you denoise the hall in the background a bit? Look at the flowerlike pattern on the wall, it doesn't look good Poco a poco (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done --Llez (talk) 11:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition and good denoising. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de la Asunción de María, Kirchhaslach, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 48-50 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 09:38:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of the church of the Assumption of Mary, Kirchhaslach, Germany.

File:Crocifisso Giovanni Teutonico o Paolo Moerich Duomo di Salò.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 09:22:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cucifix by Giovanni Teutonico now attributed to the German monk Paolo Moerich in the Santa Maria Annunziata church in Salò.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Italy
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Utterly beautiful. And something a bit new in the church-interior genre. Cmao20 (talk) 23:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The light makes the sculpture appear very 3-dimensional, beautiful colour contrast between the warm tones of the wood and the bluish background. --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very rich scene. It feels like the lens focus is behind the eyes very slightly, but the face is still sharp and even the nearest hand is clear enough when viewed pixel-for-pixel. The main object is nicely framed by the background, which is compelling and is blurred just enough to show detail without stealing the scene, helped by the good contrast in brightness between foreground and background. --Bobulous (talk) 18:59, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:White and golden graves in a Buddhist cemetery at sunrise in Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 00:35:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White and golden graves in a Buddhist cemetery at sunrise in Vang Vieng, Laos
  • Interesting consideration, however, none of these graves are exactly vertical, and the ground itself is curved. At full size, it's visible some are leaning right, and some are leaning left. Rotating will increase the angle of the grave most at the right in the foreground, that is already slightly leaning CW. Currently the walls of the building in the background are vertical. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Weak oppose The quality is good and the item interesting but the light and compo are not at FP level to me, sorry. Probably golden hour light would work better here, about the compo, I'm not sure, maybe it somehow possible to take the top higher (raising your hand or stepping on something). Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Taken at 5:42am. Woke up at 4:45 am to reach this place before sunrise. Very subtle light IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Westpolderbrêge. 12-08-2020. (actm.) 04.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2020 at 15:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fairly simple composition that's nice, and the warm light that Agnes mentions in the nomination really sells me on this as an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Optimal conditions. --A.Savin 21:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Striking image -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good light conditions. --Ivar (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It’s always the light ... --Aristeas (talk) 06:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Simple clean composition. Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Meiræ 21:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 22:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC)

File:Mexican clay skulls.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 19:16:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice. You should mention whether this is in a museum (and if so, which one), a private collection or something you photographed at a shop or something. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request hate to be that guy, but please provide copyright and authorship information for your subjects. --El Grafo (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Done El Grafo --Wilfredor (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Surely El Grafo meant the copyright of the underlying artwork; see also COM:TOYS. --A.Savin 21:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
    Yes, I'm talking about the skulls here, not about the photo. See COM:DW. Don't know if they're supposed to be art, mass-produced decorative items or toys, but they are certainly not primarily utilitarian and above the threshold of originality. We can only keep them here if they're not subject to copyright for some reason, and in order for this to become FP this needs to be documented properly. --El Grafo (talk) 09:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Ikan Kekek & El Grafo There are unsigned pieces of a private collection in San Miguel Allende. As is almost always the case with Artesanías Mexicanas (Mexican curious) they are reinterpretations of very common cultural icons and I don´t think that they are truly original works. This type of figures can be found in just about any market in Mexico during Day of the Dead celebrations. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Cool. Please add that information to the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Copyright information for the original work still not added to the file page, and I'm not convinced by the rationale given above. --El Grafo (talk) 07:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment El Grafo I suggest you read Mexican law. Between the Law and your opinion, I choose the Law. Under your rationale just about every picture of any object that depicts cultural ideas should be then be deleted. Mexican law refers to this type of work derivative work and it lacks enough originality to be granted copyright, on top of it not being signed. This is one of the millions of variants of skulls that relate to Mexican culture and death, day of the dead celebrations, etc. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 16:51:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran
  • Thanks dear Cmao20. I didn't crop the picture. The picture merged from 5 frames (50mp) that form a square with(more 100mp). I tried to capture the ceiling symmetrical but the Chandelier wasn't in the center. I could locate the Chandelier in the center and correct the ceiling Symmetry in the Photoshop, but If I had done that, the circle would cut more than this. I need to 17mm TS-E canon to capture monuments like this.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 17:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 17:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crop is poor (exterior circle cropped off), the angle looks randomed (I'd have looked for some symmetry on left/right or top/bottom), there are halos around the grid of the windows at the bottom (which doesn't happen at the top) and both corners at the bottom are pretty blurry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm reluctant to oppose because the resolution is so high, as usual, but I agree with the criticisms of the crops (and I understand they're not technically crops, but we use that term as a convenient short hand for bits of a circle being omitted). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad positioning, missed center. --Mile (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I said before Mr Mile, I located in the center of monument but the Chandelier wasn't in the center.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Given the circumstances, the technical limitations are less than they might have been. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 11.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 15:44:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Palais de l'Isle in Annecy, Haute-Savoie, France
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Solid QI but sorry, I think the composition pales in comparison to your other current nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Special architecture, nice viewpoint, pleasant light. A bit shrunk at the left, compared to the right, but overall great image in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Striking scene, but is there any way the building on the left could be sharpened? I may vote against if it can't be. Realistically, that level of unsharpness would probably make the picture less than one of the very best. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose IQ could be better, and weather too. Morning shot maybe. --Mile (talk) 07:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Basile Morin. Meiræ 21:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Per pros and cons above. There is FP potential here, but I'm not convinced by the compo. To me the palace buildings shouts for a wide angle shot (getting closer to it). Poco a poco (talk) 10:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:"Capt. Della H. Raney, Army Nurse Corps, who now heads the nursing staff at the station hospital at Camp Beale, CA - NARA - 535942.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 09:16:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Della H. Raney

File:Russischer Bär Euplagia quadripunctaria-20190808-RM-171229.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 08:39:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jersey Tiger (Euplagia quadripunctaria) on the Friesener Warte near Hirschaid in Upper Franconia

File:Patan Durbar Square-2644.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 17:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Charlesjsharp I agree with you, but I also think that there is no way to cut this photo since it is a composition that never ends at the bottom --Wilfredor (talk) 02:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles. A bottom crop that ends arbitrarily on the ground would be much preferable. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Crop, bottom and right.--Peulle (talk) 06:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support To me the buildings are what dominates the image, and they should ... I really am not bothered by the crop. Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Indeed it was ... that's what I get for doing this that late. Changed Daniel Case (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a vibrant scene, but there's no clear main subject, and if the subject is the street itself then the composition doesn't feel like it balances the various pieces. The light grey structure to the left is very much sidelined, and its outline fights with the buildings seen beyond it on both sides. The long building on the right is interesting but not very prominent in the scene, and the same holds for the tall pagoda in the distance beyond it. Additionally, to my eye the image needs to be rotated about two degrees clockwise. --Bobulous (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In this picture main subject is not just one building or street. This photo was taken from the terrace of small building as shown in this picture. And i think there is no way to crop this photo Here's some example: First Second from same photographer. Thank you Best regards -Bijay chaurasia (talk) 06:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm very much grateful to see such a beautiful holy photograph. I really don't see the crop or visitors as disturbing or not working. For me, it shows the beauty of the place and make me feels sacred. Additionally, top to mid view is really eye catching. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 07:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Senden, Schloss Senden -- 2020 -- 0486-90.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 16:13:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Senden water castle, Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • I made some vertical adjustments. --XRay talk 04:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I see that you offered now a bit more of image at the bottom, which made it IMHO worse, as now the missing piece is smaller. Sorry, but that spot spoils the nom to me. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poco a poco (talk) 10:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:WLE - 2020 - Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido - 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 14:17:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gradas de Soaso, Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido, Aragón, España.
  • I checked the note - it is straight waterline. --Moahim (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
I don't know, I didn't notice of it Ezarateesteban 18:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment These are just cracks in the rock.--Moahim (talk) 18:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK, fair enough. Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • It's a nice scene that's pretty well done, but the light conditions aren't ideal. I wonder if a little post-processing work with the tones could help... — Rhododendrites talk |  22:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I tried to fix these problems. Check the new version.--Moahim (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine for me, maybe WB is slightly too blue and brightness could be raised a little. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Rhododendrites talk |  14:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too gray to be one of the best waterfall pictures on Commons, I think. I'd like to see this view in better light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Agree, the water, especially, is too gray -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File: Swami Agnivesh (2019).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 17:58:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Swami Agnivesh in 2019
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Swami Agnivesh in 2019. Agnivesh recently died due to multiple organ failure. Created and uploaded by Mydreamsparrow - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 17:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 17:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A sad recent loss, but the quality is not up to FP level, unfortunately. Straight forward portrait that's rather low resolution/sharpness. — Rhododendrites talk |  18:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. Sounds like a great person, though. Please nominate at VIC, as the photo seems best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Rhododendrites.--Peulle (talk) 07:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as creator - Thanks for the nomination Arion. - Mydreamsparrow (talk) 15:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Rhododendrites. He sounds like a tremendous person though, I hadn't heard of him before. Per Ikan would do well at VIC. Cmao20 (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This looks like a great driver's license/ID photo. But that doesn't make it a featurable portrait. Daniel Case (talk) 14:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:2020-07-20-Alversteen-8761.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 17:42:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Megalith site Alversteen, Fehmarn, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Superbass (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The difference in brightness is very difficult to manage here. The burnt-out lights are disturbing. --Ermell (talk) 07:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks like a QI but lacks that certain something to impress me. --Peulle (talk) 12:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I dissent. The image quality is good and I like the light very much. Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the sharpness is good enough, but the harsh light in the background and composition don't quite work for me. I appreciate the idea of balancing the rocks with the tree, but it just feels like the rocks are "facing" left, where there could be more room. — Rhododendrites talk |  22:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Of course I was hoping for broad support, and of course I think I took the best possible photo under the conditions on site :-) But I am very satisfied with the respectful tone of the critical or rejecting voices. Even if the picture does not become a featured one, I will keep this in good memory. --Superbass (talk) 07:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose The blown highlights are not very well done. As Ermell says, it's difficult, but a successful trick is to underexpose - not only 1 EV, maybe 4 or 5 EV in that case. Example for comparison. Also mitigated wow factor in my view, but I could have remained neutral if the leaves were not burnt like now -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Nice idea, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Technical issues per Ermell, but even without them this is just a picture of rocks balanced on each other in the woods that doesn't wow me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Lengurbill beach 19.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 12:30:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lengurbill beach, Teknaf, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded & nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm not sure how this nomination will fare here, but I enjoy the peacefulness of the beach with the boat in the middleground and in fact center of the picture frame, half on sand and half on tide, rather than the foreground, with the clouds providing another horizontal above it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The subject is interesting, but the composition boring (too centered) and ligthing and quality are not extraordinary, it's also tilted (see sea horizon) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poco a poco (talk • contribs)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it a lot --Kritzolina (talk) 20:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The quality should be better. The sharpness is low and there are halos around some objects. --XRay talk 16:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per XRay, I like the composition though. Cmao20 (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Would have been better more tightly focused on the boat and the two guys at either end. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:AfricanKingCapek.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 10:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African King

File:California Academy of Sciences San Francisco December 2016 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 06:47:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

California Academy of Sciences

File:Gymnadenia odoratissima - Niitvälja bog.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 05:11:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Short spurred fragrant orchid
  • @PetarM: it's a natural background. This smooth effect comes along with macro photography, if you shoot very close to the small subject. --Ivar (talk) 12:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support The photo could probably have been sharper. But I think it's a nice recording.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support per Poco and Famberhorst. Cmao20 (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 10:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Poco. The bar for flower images has been set pretty high. Daniel Case (talk) 15:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Broad Street Downtown Area in Nevada City, California.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 04:16:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Broad Street in Nevada City, California, on May 31, 2020. The historic buildings along Broad Street in the former mining town of Nevada City are part of the “Nevada City Downtown Historic District”.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United_States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 09:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Charming small-town main street with evergreens. Just oozes atmosphere and a pleasant mood. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For me the wow is insufficient, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 07:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition and light. It reminds me a lot of this FP, except while that one is quintessentially English, this is quintessentially Californian. Cmao20 (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as per Cmao20 Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Weak oppose I have to agree with Peulle Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral A very pleasant scene, but low on wow in my opinion. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I see the idea, but while it makes a QI easily it just doesn't keep it together for FA. First, the light is a little harsh ... I know this may have been the only time of day you could get the buildings lit, but if that's so this is not the picture with taking for FA. Second, unlike the Diliff image that Cmao linked, the regularity of the buildings is not there in enough quantity to overcome all the distractions like the cars and the trees. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The parked cars on the right side serve no compositional purpose and should be cropped out (leaving sufficient space to the right of the moving cars). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, per others. --Milseburg (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Ընտրյալ_պատկերների_թեկնածուներ&oldid=358006109"