Commons:秀逸な画像の推薦

現在の候補へスキップ 現在の除外候補へスキップ

ここにある画像は秀逸な画像への候補画像です。 今日の一枚とは異なりますのでご注意ください。

下記へスキップ：

• 作品を推薦する
• 画像のガイドライン
• 現在の秀逸な画像の候補
• 秀逸な画像からの除外
• 現在の除外候補
• 秀逸な画像の候補での方針
• 目次

概要

推薦にあたって

推薦者のためのガイドライン

まずはじめに、『秀逸な画像ガイドライン』、『画像のガイドライン』をお読みください。

ここでは推薦画像の評価を受ける・する際の必要事項を要約して紹介します。

• 解像度 - 200万ピクセル以下の写真画像は、特別な理由が無い限り却下されます。1,600 x 1,200 ピクセル（1.92メガピクセル）は200万ピクセルには届いていない事にご注意ください。

コモンズに置かれた画像は一般的なＰＣモニターのみで閲覧されるとは限らず、プリントアウトや高解像度モニターで表示される可能性もあります。将来的にもどのような機器が用いられるようになるかは誰にも予想出来ないので、推薦画像が可能な限り高い解像度を保っている事は重要な事なのです。

• スキャン画像 - 公式な方針ではありませんが、Help:スキャニングページで各種様々な画像を準備するための有用なアドバイスが提供されています。

• フォーカス - 通常、重要な被写体は全て焦点が合っていなければいけません。

• 前景と背景 - 前景や背景に主題ではない物が写り込むと、それは“余計なもの”になり得ます。前景にある物が主題の重要な部分を隠していないか、背景にあるものが構図を損ねていないか（例：後ろの街灯が人物の頭の上から生えているように見える、等）を確認しましょう。

• 全体品質 - 推薦される画像には高い技術品質が要求されます。

• デジタル補正 - 見る人を欺いてはいけません。写真画像のキズ・ホコリ等を修正する、良い編集、故意に人を騙す目的でない限り、デジタル補正は一般的に歓迎されます。例を挙げると、色合い/露出補正、シャープ/ボカシ、遠近感歪み補正、トリミング（切り取り）等がこれにあたります。背景に写り込んだ余計な物を取り除く等のさらに大がかりな修正は、{{Retouched picture}}テンプレートを画像ページへ貼付け、修正した旨を記述しましょう。記述漏れや記述ミスがある等、主題を不正確に見せる編集は決して受け入れられません。

• 価値 - 『全ての画像の中でも特に際立ち、最も価値のある画像』が我々の大きな目標です。秀逸な画像はそれぞれの分野の中でも別格でなけらばならず、故に次の点に留意して下さい。
  • たいていの夕日は美しく見えますが、そういう画像のほとんどは他の夕日画像と大差ありません。
  • 夜景は美しいですが、普通は日中に撮影された写真の方がより詳細を見せてくれます。
  • 必ずしも『美しさに価値がある』わけではありません。

技術的側面では『露出』、『構図』、『動感表現』、『被写界深度』等を見ます。

• 露出とはシャッタースピードと絞りとの組み合わせの事を言い、適切なトーンカーブが見せる陰影〜ハイライトが有用なディティールを描写します。これをラティチュード（露光寛容度）と言い、このラティチュードの陰影〜ハイライトの領域内において、画像を暗め、中庸、明るめに作る事が出来ますが、デジタルカメラ及びデジタル画像はこのラティチュードの範囲がフィルムに比べて狭いです。ディティールの欠損した影部分は必ずしも「悪い」わけではなく、実際にその様な効果が望ましい場合（部分）もあります。ただしディティールの欠損したハイライト部分が大きく面積を占めるのは良くありません。

• 構図とは画像画面内での各要素の配置の事を言います。“三分割法”は構図作成には良い方法で、美術学校でも教えられています。まず、画像に水平線と垂直線をそれぞれ２本引き、画像を水平・垂直方向とも３分割します。主題を中央に配置するとたいていは画面に面白味を欠き、水平線と垂直線が交差する４つの交点の内どれか１つに主題を置いた方が良い画面になるでしょう。地平線は画面を半分に切ってしまうので、通常は地平線を中央に配置するべきではありません。上寄り、若しくは下寄りに配置させる方が良いでしょう。主たる考え方としては空間を上手に使い、躍動感・臨場感のある画面を作るという事です。

• 動感表現 - ここでは被写体の「動き」を表現する手法を紹介します。動きのある被写体は止まって見えるか、もしくはブレて写りますが、これらはどちらの方が良いとは必ずしも言えず、どのような表現意図を持っているかによります。「動感」は主題と共に写り込んでいる他の背景等との関係で表現されます。例えばレーシングカーの撮影。車と背景とが共に止まって見えては、見る側にスピード感は伝わってきません。　なので撮影手法によって車は画面内で止まっているように写り、かつ背景をブレさせることでスピード感が表現され、このような手法を「パンニング（流し撮り）」と呼びます。一方で、背景と共に止まって撮られた高く跳躍したバスケットボール選手は、これは決定的瞬間の「不自然」なポーズになり、これも良い写真になり得るでしょう。

• 被写界深度（DOF）とは主題の前側から後ろ側までのフォーカスエリアの事を言います。被写界深度は全ての画像で明解な意図のもと選択され、深い、または浅い被写界深度は、画像に品質を与えもし、また損なわせもします。浅い被写界深度は、主題を他の被写体から切り離し、見せたい被写体に注目を集めることが出来ます。深い被写界深度は空間を強調させる事が出来ます。広角（短焦点）レンズは深い被写界深度、逆に望遠（長焦点）レンズは浅い被写界深度が得られる傾向があります。また絞りを絞り込むと被写界深度は深く、解放すると浅い被写界深度が得られます。

グラフィック要素では形状、ボリューム、色、テクスチャー、遠近感、バランス、比率 等を見ます。

• 形状とは主題に対する輪郭線、及び形状を言います。

• ボリュームとは主題の立体感に対する品質を言います。立体感は横からのライティングで表現出来、反対に正面からのライティングは被写体を平坦に見せる傾向があり、不向きとされています。自然光の中でベストな光を得るには、早朝か、もしくは夕方の日の光が良いでしょう。

• 色は大変重要で、強すぎる色合いは好ましくありません。

• テクスチャーとは主題の表面材質の描写性に於ける品質を言います。表面材質は横からのライティングにより強調され、手に触れて伝わるかのような質感を与えます。

• 遠近感とは、画像の画面内若しくは外にある消失点で繋がる放射状の直線、これに沿った形で現れる「角度」により表現されます。

• バランスでは画像の画面内での重心が左右均衡か、若しくは片方に寄る等適切な配置が成されているかを見ます。

• 比率では画面の大きさに対する被写体の大きさを見ます。一般的に、小さな被写体は小さく写真に表現してしまう傾向にありますが、相応しい撮影手法により小さな被写体を実寸とは逆に大きく見せる事が可能です。例えば、小さな花を大きな山よりも大きく見る事が出来ます。この手法を指して「倒置法」と呼びます。

主題の全ての要素を画像に盛込む必要はありません。多くの写真はそれぞれの個性で評価出来ます。すなわち、画像の色やテクスチャー等々により判断出来ます。

• 『象徴性か妥当性か』　ー　『秀逸な画像』ではしばしばこのようなテーマで意見論争が起こる傾向にあります。技術的・品質的には出来の悪い写真でも極めて撮影困難な被写体を捉えた写真は、凡庸な被写体を写した品質的に良い写真よりも評価されます。もちろん撮影困難な被写体を写し、かつ品質も良い写真は極めて価値の高い写真と言えます。

画像は時に撮影者と評価者、若しくはどちらか片方の文化的な偏りが見られます。画像の意図は画像そのものの文化的背景により評価されるべきであり、評価者の文化的背景に依存してはいけません。イメージは人に語りかけ、そして慈しみ、怒り、拒絶、幸せ、悲しみ等の感情を喚起させる力を持っています。良い写真から与えられる心地よさには限りがありません。

画像のガイドラインを事前に読めば、あなたの推薦が成就する可能性を最大限に引き伸ばしてくれるでしょう。

新規推薦

推薦に値する価値があると考えられる画像を作った、または見つけたならば、その画像に適切な説明とライセンスが与えられているかを確認し、以下に従ってください。

ステップ１：画像名（接頭Image:を含む）を下のテキストボックス内の文字列の後にコピー＆ペースト、正しく Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg と記入されているかを確認し、続いて『作品を推薦』ボタンをクリックします。

ステップ２：ページ編集画面上にある指示に従い必要箇所を付記、ページを保存してください。

ステップ３：ステップ２で作成したページへのリンクをFeatured picture candidates/candidate listへ手動で挿入します。ページ編集をクリックし、候補リスト最上部に以下の書式で推薦画像へのリンクを加えます。

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg}}

投票

投票には以下のテンプレートを使用します：

• {{支持}}または{{Support}} （ Support、 Support),
• {{反対}}または{{Oppose}} （ Oppose、 Oppose),
• {{中立}}または{{Neutral}} ( Neutral、 Neutral),
• {{コメント}}または{{Comment}} ( Comment、 Comment),
• 情報：{{Info}} ( Info),
• 質問：{{Question}} ( Question).

テンプレート{{FPX|理由}}を用いて、推薦画像が秀逸な画像の推薦に相応しくない旨を指摘出来ます。テンプレートの「理由」部分に、秀逸な画像には明確に値しない事の説明を書き加えます（可能ならば英語で）。

あなたが何故その画像を好むか、または好まないか、特に( Supportや( Opposeの投票をする際は簡単な理由を加えましょう。また署名（~~~~）も忘れずに。匿名投票は受け付けられません。

秀逸な画像からの除外

時も経ればやがて『秀逸な画像』の基準も変わります。かつては“充分に価値に値する”と決定されたであろう画像も、その価値は普遍ではありません。ここでは「もはや『秀逸な画像』に値しない」と考えられる画像をリストアップします。リストされた画像へは、{{Keep}}  Keep 及び {{維持}}  Keep （＝『秀逸な画像』に値する）、または{{Delist}}  Delist 及び {{除外}}  Oppose （＝『秀逸な画像』に値しない）を投票します。

あなたが『秀逸な画像』の価値基準に値しないと考える画像があれば、除外候補として提出できます。除外したい画像の画像名（接頭Image:を含む）を下のテキストボックスの文字列の後にコピー＆ペーストします。

あなたが作成した新規除外候補のページに以下を加えます。

• 画像の作者、投稿者等の出所情報。
• その画像の“過去の秀逸な画像への推薦”ページへのリンク（画像ページの「リンク節」に表示されています）。
• あなたが除外と考える理由とあなたの署名。

次に、Commons:Featured picture candidates/removalを編集し、下記の書式で作成した除外候補のページのリンクを手動で最上段に挿入します。

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:除外画像名.jpg}}

秀逸な画像の候補での方針

総則

1. 投票期間を終えた後、結果は推薦日時から数えて10日後（下記タイムテーブル参照）に決定します。投票期間は推薦日時から数えて9日と23時間59分です。１０日、またはそれを超えた投票はカウントされません。
2. 匿名寄稿者による推薦を歓迎します。
3. 匿名寄稿者による議論への参加を歓迎します。
4. 匿名寄稿者による投票はカウントされません。
5. 推薦者票は投票へはカウントされません。支持は明示的かつ言明される必要があります。
6. 推薦者は自身の推薦をいつでも取り下げる事が出来ます。推薦を取り下げるには "I withdraw my nomination" （推薦を取り下げます）と書くか、テンプレート {{withdraw|~~~~}} を加えます。
7. ウィキメディア・コモンズのプロジェクトの目的は、全てのウィキメディアプロジェクト（将来的なプロジェクト含む）に於いて自由に利用可能な画像を集積するセントラル・データベースを提供することである、ということを忘れないでください。セントラル・データベースは単純にウィキメディアの保管庫と言うわけではなく、また『秀逸な画像』等のプロジェクトに応じた判断をされるべきではありません。
8. 推薦日から数えて５日間支持を受けられなかった画像（推薦者票含まず）は候補リストから外されます。（下記タイムテーブル参照）
9. テンプレート{{FPX}}が貼られた画像は、テンプレート{{FPX}}の適用後は推薦者以外の支持票が無い限り、48時間後に候補リストから外されます。

秀逸と除外のルール

候補画像は下記必要事項に準じて秀逸な画像に認定されます。

1. 適切なライセンス情報が添付されている。
2. 最低５票以上の支持票を得ている。
3. 支持：反対比率が2:1 (賛成が3分の2の過半数)以上である。
4. ２つの同様な画像での異なったバージョンは同時に『秀逸な画像』へは認定されず、より支持票の多かった一枚を認定します。

除外ルールでは、投票期間、及びリストから外される期間は秀逸ルールと同じ期間を取ります。除外候補提出後５日間で提出者以外の  Delist （ Oppose）票が得られなかった候補は、５日間ルールが適用され、候補リストから外されます。

常連ユーザーが推薦・投票の完了方法に従って、推薦投票を閉じることがあります。終了方法に関してはCommons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finishedを参照。

何よりも礼儀を忘れずに

どうか、あなたが評価するその画像が「人の作品」であることを忘れないでください。「これはヒドイ」、「こんなのキライだ」と言ったような表現は避けましょう。もしあなたが『反対』に票を投じなければならないのなら、思いやりを忘れずに。また、あなたの話す英語は、また誰か他の人の話す英語とは同じではないでしょう。慎重に言葉を選んでください。

それでは良い評価を。そして、全てのルールは壊すことが出来るという事を忘れないでください。

関連項目

• 候補リストの編集はこちら：Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
• 日付順秀逸な画像リスト：Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
• 秀逸な画像候補アーカイブ：Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
• 推薦・投票の完了方法：Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
• 基礎英語による写真・画像用語解説
• 秀逸な画像の候補リスト
• Photography critiques（画像評論）
• Help:スキャニング

秀逸な画像の候補

purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates

File:Sunflower and a bee.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 19:17:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sunflower and a bee.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunflower and a bee.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
•  Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 19:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Cala Rajada na Ferradura escultura Joan Bennàssar-1371.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 16:45:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Cala Rajada na Ferradura escultura Joan Bennàssar-1371.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cala Rajada na Ferradura escultura Joan Bennàssar-1371.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
•  Info created & uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 16:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 16:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral I have nothing against the composition, but this sculpture is horrible and seems to be the product of another destructive restoration work --Wilfredor (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img71 Maçka Gondola.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 14:10:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img71 Maçka Gondola.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img71 Maçka Gondola.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Cableways
•  Info View of the Maçka Gondola in Istanbul, with Hilton Istanbul Bosphorus in the background ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 14:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 14:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The exposure has been well controlled, but the scene feels very cluttered to me, and the various lines all conflict with each other (the lines of the suspension cables, the lines of the buildings, and the lines of the trees bursting into the scene from all angles). --Bobulous (talk) 19:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Smoking, Bo-Kaap, Cape Town (P1060001).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 09:03:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Smoking, Bo-Kaap, Cape Town (P1060001).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Smoking, Bo-Kaap, Cape Town (P1060001).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info all by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 09:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- MB-one (talk) 09:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose nothing special --Nexo20 (talk) 16:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose This image doesn't work for me, unfortunately. The scene is pedestrian, the lone figure looks a little out of focus well before getting to 100%, the shop behind them is largely obscured and fairly gloomy, and the block wall framing it all is not pleasing the eye. --Bobulous (talk) 19:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Image:Kanadagans auf dem Raakmoorteich im Naturschutzgebiet Raakmoor.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 08:40:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/Image:Kanadagans auf dem Raakmoorteich im Naturschutzgebiet Raakmoor.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Kanadagans auf dem Raakmoorteich im Naturschutzgebiet Raakmoor.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
•  Info created by User:Käptn Klabauter - uploaded by Käptn Klabauter - nominated by Nexo20 -- Nexo20 (talk) 08:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Nexo20 (talk) 08:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose As much as I like the goose's pose, the rest of the composition is too distracting from the subject. --MB-one (talk) 09:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The green of the leaves looks somewhat unnatural to me, the saturation seems too high. What do other people think? --Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

• Yes, saturated colors and the blacks are too intense -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

• Weak  Support, pending any edits per Aristeas' point above. I really like how the goose is framed by that filigree of foliage, a growing trunk or two, a fallen trunk and the reflections. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blown highlights (chest) -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Mode Gakuen Cocoon Tower in the evening with blue sky Tokyo Japan.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 06:21:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mode Gakuen Cocoon Tower in the evening with blue sky Tokyo Japan.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mode Gakuen Cocoon Tower in the evening with blue sky Tokyo Japan.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Japan
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Nexo20 (talk) 08:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support simple and effective. --MB-one (talk) 09:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I like the tower and the dome - good current-day architecture, which is rare and nice to see. However, the overall composition is not great to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Collina presso Nagasaki, bozzetto di Alexandre Bailly, Marcel Jambon per Madama Butterfly (1906) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON000079 - Restoration.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 03:41:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Collina presso Nagasaki, bozzetto di Alexandre Bailly, Michel Jambon per Madama Butterfly (1906) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON000079 - Restoration.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Collina presso Nagasaki, bozzetto di Alexandre Bailly, Michel Jambon per Madama Butterfly (1906) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON000079 - Restoration.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment
•  Info created by Alexandre Bailly and Marcel Jambon - restored and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Info One of the first restorations - I think - from the recent collaboration with the Archivo Storico Ricordi. One issue: I'm pretty sure - and have sources to confirm - that it's actually Marcel Jambon - at least in modern spelling: back in the early 1900s it as a lot more common to change name spellings for different countries. I'm checking with the Wikimedian in Residence about that. It shouldn't matter at all, but would mean that this page and the file page will move to reflect that if it checks out. I'm listing by initials in the meantime. Edit:Yep. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support That's quite nice. I'm kind of astonished that someone would do such a nice watercolor of a stage design. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Different set designers used different media, but set designs, at least the old-school ones, could occasionally be stunning artworks their own right. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:360° panoramas Estonian University of Life Sciences, research.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 22:07:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:360° panoramas Estonian University of Life Sciences, research.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° panoramas Estonian University of Life Sciences, research.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
•  Info created by Lauri Veerde - uploaded by Eesti Maaülikool - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 22:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 22:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support First class. There is only a stitching error at the yellow sticking tape at the roof, but this is minimal. -- -donald- (talk) 06:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 07:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very eye catching. Sharp throughout the central areas, and pleasingly smooth in the areas unavoidably distorted by the 180° view. Well exposed despite the variety of lighting, and rich with interesting textures. --Bobulous (talk) 19:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Kehtna Kutsehariduskeskus 005-kokad pano.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 22:06:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kehtna Kutsehariduskeskus 005-kokad pano.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kehtna Kutsehariduskeskus 005-kokad pano.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
•  Info created by Lauri Veerde - uploaded & nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 22:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 22:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Awesome. High educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing to look at with the 360° viewer. Technically the weak side is a high level of noise in the 2D version, but considering the huge resolution (18,384 × 9,192 pixels), for an interior shot where the moving subjects are rather sharp and the DoF generous, I think 1600 ISO is forgivable. Very interesting document -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect. -- -donald- (talk) 06:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- I wish I could create such a spectacular panoramic! MartinD (talk) 07:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Really impressive, also really good image quality. --Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Absolutely brilliant. A fascinating scene which takes several minutes to fully explore. It's well exposed, and has nice bursts of colour in amongst the chrome. The image is surprisingly noisy at 100%, but by the time the image is stretched to 100% it would be absolutely huge (nearly seven [4K 34-inch] monitors high and more than seven wide) so I see no real problem there. I can easily imagine seeing this in the Picture Of The Day box on the main page. --Bobulous (talk) 19:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Rutherford Hill Wine Cave-1351.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 20:46:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rutherford Hill Wine Cave-1351.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rutherford Hill Wine Cave-1351.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United_States
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice long-exposure shot -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:St Mary le Strand Church from balcony, London, UK - Diliff.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 14:39:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:St Mary le Strand Church from balcony, London, UK - Diliff.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Mary le Strand Church from balcony, London, UK - Diliff.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#London
•  Info With its decorative Italianate interior inspired by the work of Roman sculptors such as Luigi Fontana, St Mary le Strand is one of London's most unusual and interesting churches (still more for being located in the middle of a traffic island). Constructed between 1714 and 1724, its Baroque styling and plastered ceiling were highly controversial for an English church. There is a more conventional pew-level view but I think this view from the balcony is better. created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Well balanced tones, given the range of lighting levels. Rich colours, and a very intricate and detailed venue. --Bobulous (talk) 20:29, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice composition, although the cutoff of the nearest chandelier is unfortunate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 02:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:SOB Re 456 Weissenbachviadukt Degersheim.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 13:58:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:SOB Re 456 Weissenbachviadukt Degersheim.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SOB Re 456 Weissenbachviadukt Degersheim.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
•  Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 13:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 14:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Wow-y enough for me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not for me, unfortunately. The train and bridge are a little small in the scene, the train seems somewhat overexposed, and the bare trees and straggly bits (fence posts?) in the bottom of the image keep distracting. Possibly a different crop and a tone curve adjustment would appease me, but let's see what others think. --Bobulous (talk) 20:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 22:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Bloem van gevlekt havikskruid (Hieracium maculatum). 02-09-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 04:41:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bloem van gevlekt havikskruid (Hieracium maculatum). 02-09-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloem van gevlekt havikskruid (Hieracium maculatum). 02-09-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg

• Gallery:Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
•  Info Flower of Hieracium maculatum. A rare species in the Netherlands. Focus stack of 11 photos.
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Seven Pandas (talk) 01:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Reichstagsgebäude, Berlin-Mitte, 170402, ako.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 17:58:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Reichstagsgebäude, Berlin-Mitte, 170402, ako.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reichstagsgebäude, Berlin-Mitte, 170402, ako.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
•  Info There are other FPs of the Reichstag building, but none from this angle. I like the early morning light and I think it's quite nice that both the German flags are blowing towards the camera. created by Code - uploaded by Code - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 00:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but I want to see the dome.--Claus 05:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

• Understandable, but my argument would be we already have good FPs where you can see the dome. I nominated this picture because it's something a little different. Cmao20 (talk) 16:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Striking contrast, colour, and texture. --Bobulous (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Bobulous --Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Moshe Ganbash - Shiviti - Google Art Project.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 16:45:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Moshe Ganbash - Shiviti - Google Art Project.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moshe Ganbash - Shiviti - Google Art Project.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Judaism
•  Info created by Moshe Ganbash - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 16:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Andrei (talk) 16:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cmao20 (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 00:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de San Carlos Borromeo, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 164-166 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 10:12:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Carlos Borromeo, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 164-166 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Carlos Borromeo, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 164-166 HDR.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Austria
•  Info Night view of the facade of St. Charles Church (Karlskirche), Vienna, Austria. The baroque church is dedicated to Charles Borromeo and is one of the city's greatest buildings. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 10:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 10:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Beautiful, but a little noisy in the sky. Could you work on that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

  Ikan Kekek:  Done Poco a poco (talk) 14:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks, much better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Strong support Nearly perfect for me. True, there is some sky noise, but it's still great for a night shot. The detail on the building and the light conditions are exceptional. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 00:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg official SCOTUS portrait.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 00:06:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg official SCOTUS portrait.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg official SCOTUS portrait.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
•  Info created by Steve Petteway uploaded by Gage - nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 00:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ezarateesteban 00:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Of course I see why you nominated this, with RBG having just passed away, but I think it's not an outstanding portrait in terms of image quality. There is quite a lot of colour noise and a large amount of JPEG artefacting which is a shame for a photo that is not especially large. For me it would be better to wait until emotions have died down a little over this sad event and see if there are better photos of Ms Ginsburg available. Cmao20 (talk) 01:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose RIP RBG, but not a great portrait of her. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not an outstanding portrait. --Gnosis (talk) 00:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Garzweiler surface mine Bucket-wheel excavator 2019 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 19:58:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Garzweiler surface mine Bucket-wheel excavator 2019 1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garzweiler surface mine Bucket-wheel excavator 2019 1.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
•  Info created & uploaded by Arne Müseler - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm not sure how I feel about the photo, overall, but I'm definitely feeling like I want a wider crop on the right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Dramatic photo although there is a bit of barrel distortion. Cmao20 (talk) 01:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 08:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The subject is original and the composition good but the quality is clearly below FP level. It's too grainy (visiblem above all in the sky), lacks some sharpness and needs some perspective adjustments to get verticals vertical. I'd change my vote if the issues are successfully addressed Poco a poco (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Looks like a top-down view to me. Doesn't make sense to fix the verticals in that case (I got the same remark in this nomination). Looking at the machine at full size, it's really tack sharp. Shot with an Hasselblad at 100 ISO. Apart from a very very little noise in the sky, I really don't see why the quality would be "clearly below FP" -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:26, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

• Indeed, the image quality looks fine to me. The grain is pretty minimal and not a big deal. And the excavator itself is really sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 17:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
• I was confused by this comment, thought it looked rather crappy for a high-class medium format camera – until I realized that that "Hasselblad" is the 1″ sensor on-board camera of the Mavic 2 Pro. Now it makes sense. Actually looks pretty good for a drone shot. --El Grafo (talk) 15:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support I didn't like this shot the first several times I looked at its thumbnail. But on filling the screen with it, it does keep drawing the eye to the dozens of nested structures hidden within. And to my eye the detail on the main body of the machine is crispy even at 100%. The ancillary body to the right is softer but still offers enough detail to show off yet more structures within this beast of a machine. I like the parallel bands of colour, and the textures in the sandy layer. So I've changed my mind: this does feel like a striking image. --Bobulous (talk) 20:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- MartinD (talk) 07:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Bridge at Makhtesh Ramon (40582).jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 16:54:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bridge at Makhtesh Ramon (40582).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bridge at Makhtesh Ramon (40582).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#Israel
•  Info A bridge along a cliff path, looking out to Makhtesh Ramon in the Mitzpe Ramon desert. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk |  16:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  16:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 21:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Really nice light. Cmao20 (talk) 01:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 08:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Andrei (talk) 08:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Not the nicest bridge I've ever seen but the scene, compo and light are nice Poco a poco (talk) 10:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support it looks like a apocalyptic scene --Wilfredor (talk) 17:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I keep coming back to this image, but I just can't get it to work for me. The bridge and walkway invite the question: what are they there for, where do they go? And the image doesn't answer that. The shot is sharp and well exposed, but the scene just doesn't fit together for me. --Bobulous (talk) 20:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

• I understand that you're looking for an answer from the image, but I'll add an answer in text form anyway: this is along the Israel National Trail at the edge of Makhtesh Ramon. Basically a cliffside path. The bridge, if I recall correctly, only serves to take you to the little lookout area on the other side of it (the little area pictured). It was entirely optional, which I was glad for because it was old and missing planks and bowing in the middle and kind of scary. So the answers to "what is it there for" and "where does it go" are there... they're just not very interesting. :) Mainly I just liked the scene/composition. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  20:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Neutral What a pity that the first pole is cut off (when the bridge is the main theme as the title says) --Llez (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Squirrel watching over the coast in La Jolla (70350).jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 14:41:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Squirrel watching over the coast in La Jolla (70350).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Squirrel watching over the coast in La Jolla (70350).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United_States
•  Info Squirrel watching over the beach from a nearby cliff, making sure everybody's ok. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The squirrel is looking the other way. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Only because I distracted him. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support We can see the squirrel's eye, so I think it's OK. Nice idea for a picture. Cmao20 (talk) 01:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Latzfonser Kreuz mit Dolomiten.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 12:48:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Latzfonser Kreuz mit Dolomiten.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Latzfonser Kreuz mit Dolomiten.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
•  Info Place of pilgrimage above Klausen in the Sarntal Alps. In the background the Dolomites. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Milseburg (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Well done, I think this is a really thoughtful and satisfying composition. Cmao20 (talk) 13:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support wow. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support My home --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. Perhaps WB is just a little too green. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice scene, great background Poco a poco (talk) 10:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Buidhe (talk) 01:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Ceiling of golden Iwan at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of golden Iwan at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of golden Iwan at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
•  Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support A tiny bit of blue CA on the top left though. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support but per KoH. This is great though, I love the gold. Cmao20 (talk) 00:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very large resolution, beautiful golden patterns, nice sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support, but please fix the CA per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks. CA fixed.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 13:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, good crop, the item presented as it is... FP. Poco a poco (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Basile and Poco. --Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 10:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support GRDN711 (talk) 04:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Buidhe (talk) 00:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Clapham Lodge.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 19:26:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Clapham Lodge.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clapham Lodge.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
•  Info created by User:Bobulous - uploaded by User:Bobulous - nominated by Bobulous -- Bobulous (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bobulous (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support good composition. --Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose A 3/4 backlit shot can often be quite effective, but here the stone wall blocks the composition and casts an undesirable shadow on the foreground pavement. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Welcome to FPC (as far as I know, i haven't seen you nominate before). I like the shot but I think it is for me a bit more QI than FP. The subject is IMO not really that outstanding and for a building that isn't that naturally impressive I would only support a photo shot under excellent light or really outstanding composition. I actually like the composition, but I think the light is a little bit less than ideal - per KoH the shadows caused by the backlighting are not that attractive for me. There is also a little bit of blue chromatic aberration in the branches at the top, though this is easily fixable and not the reason for my oppose. Please, keep trying at FPC - this is not too far off the standard. Cmao20 (talk) 00:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • @King of Hearts, Cmao20: Thank you for your reviews. The blurring of the branches at the very top of the image is not caused by CA, but by the extreme edge of a shifted lens (a Canon TS-E 24mm mk II, very possibly shifted to the maximum to give a 12mm rise). I don't believe that such loss of resolution can be fixed in post (but I am hoping Canon will soon release a newer model which exhibits this effect less severely). I did wonder if the backlighting would put off some people, but decided to nominate because my eye keeps getting caught by the soft glow of the building face even though it's in shade and competing with areas lit by direct sunlight. If anyone is interested, I could offer an alternative crop which removes most of the road, but I kept it originally because I liked the long shadows made by the gate in the low sun. --Bobulous (talk) 18:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I’m not at all sold on the composition, sorry. At least, I’d entirely crop out the foreground road. Then, I’d love to see more of the tree on the left, as a counterweight to the one on the right. --Kreuzschnabel 21:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Jacques Cartier 1851-1852.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:55:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Jacques Cartier 1851-1852.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jacques Cartier 1851-1852.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People
•  Info created by Théophile Hamel - uploaded and nominated by -- Wilfredor (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wilfredor (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Nice painting but IMO a little bit less sharp than many painting reproductions at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp enough for an FP reproduction of a painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Funeral for a friend.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Funeral for a friend.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Funeral for a friend.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Black clay folk art from Mexico depicting skeletons. Photo taken from a private collection in San Miguel Allende, Mexico. Arrangement by me. -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Next time you could take two pictures to prevent the DoF problem --Wilfredor (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
• Copyright of the figurines? It is clearly a derivative work. Renata3 (talk) 01:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
• Where is the manufacturer \ artist information?  Oppose unless we have that.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 12:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 03.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 03.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support A striking scene and mix of colour amid monochrome, with a beautiful mix of tones. --Bobulous (talk) 19:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Great idea with the multiple leading lines towards the top of the mountain. I do wish, however, that the closest pole on the right didn't intersect the mountain; a little forward (to get past it) or backward (to make it smaller in the frame) would do the trick. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Composition and colour work really well for me. Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely, great light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 10:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Bobulous and KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Buidhe (talk) 00:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Passageway - Funchal 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 12:06:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Passageway - Funchal 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Passageway - Funchal 01.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Other
•  Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I love it --Wilfredor (talk) 12:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice pic - finding beauty in decay. Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak Support Nice (it reminds me that composition) but underexposed in my view. Even the background is not so bright - Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't think it's comparable with that composition. The "dark" wall is not an external facade like in the other picture you mention but the back wall of a passage. This windowless passage is very dark. I had to brighten it up a bit, in the original shot the wall was even darker. The background is a narrow inner courtyard, surrounded by high walls with no direct light (and not a large park; it was a sunny day when the picture was taken). --Llez (talk) 01:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Both compositions are comparable. Not the same images, but two centered compositions with round door in the wall, and vegetation behind. (And this is the aspect I like).
• Now of course I notice the camera is located in a darker room. Still, overall the image is divided into two parts: 1) One very dark foreground 2) One grey background. And just a tiny luminous area at the top of the stairs. 90% of the surface is too dark. You're saying there was no direct light in this narrow courtyard, due to tall walls, and yes, unfortunately that's visible: the exposure is not well set in my view. Sorry but same problem as here before it was fixed. You can increase quite a lot the light of the whole image and create a more appealing appearance -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• OK now -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support per Cmao20. I would try Basile’s hint, but I already like the photo as it is. --Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Info I did my best. But I have put the original raw file online, perhaps someone tries to improve the picture even more, I didn't succeed. --Llez (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Just add +0.6 exposure in Lightroom and that's done IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• I tried it, but then is too much noise in the darker part. Could you try it and upload the result in the folder of the link? --Llez (talk) 17:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Sure,  Done You may want to adjust the noise level with the 2nd version (obtained with Topaz DeNoise AI) -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Many thanks, I uploaded the version improved by you --Llez (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice shot but could you denoise the hall in the background a bit? Look at the flowerlike pattern on the wall, it doesn't look good Poco a poco (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done --Llez (talk) 11:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition and good denoising. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de la Asunción de María, Kirchhaslach, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 48-50 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 09:38:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de la Asunción de María, Kirchhaslach, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 48-50 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de la Asunción de María, Kirchhaslach, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 48-50 HDR.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Germany
•  Info Pipe organ, apostle statues and ceiling of the Baroque church of the Assumption of Mary, Kirchhaslach, Germany. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 09:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 09:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Muhammad (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Really nice. Cmao20 (talk) 23:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very beautiful. --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Striking, sharp throughout, evenly lit, and rich with texture. --Bobulous (talk) 18:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Buidhe (talk) 00:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Crocifisso Giovanni Teutonico o Paolo Moerich Duomo di Salò.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 09:22:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Crocifisso Giovanni Teutonico o Paolo Moerich Duomo di Salò.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crocifisso Giovanni Teutonico o Paolo Moerich Duomo di Salò.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Italy
•  Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Strong support Utterly beautiful. And something a bit new in the church-interior genre. Cmao20 (talk) 23:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The light makes the sculpture appear very 3-dimensional, beautiful colour contrast between the warm tones of the wood and the bluish background. --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very rich scene. It feels like the lens focus is behind the eyes very slightly, but the face is still sharp and even the nearest hand is clear enough when viewed pixel-for-pixel. The main object is nicely framed by the background, which is compelling and is blurred just enough to show detail without stealing the scene, helped by the good contrast in brightness between foreground and background. --Bobulous (talk) 18:59, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:White and golden graves in a Buddhist cemetery at sunrise in Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 00:35:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:White and golden graves in a Buddhist cemetery at sunrise in Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:White and golden graves in a Buddhist cemetery at sunrise in Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Laos
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment To my eye, this looks like it needs to be rotated clockwise by somewhere between one and two degrees. --Bobulous (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

• Interesting consideration, however, none of these graves are exactly vertical, and the ground itself is curved. At full size, it's visible some are leaning right, and some are leaning left. Rotating will increase the angle of the grave most at the right in the foreground, that is already slightly leaning CW. Currently the walls of the building in the background are vertical. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The quality is good and the item interesting but the light and compo are not at FP level to me, sorry. Probably golden hour light would work better here, about the compo, I'm not sure, maybe it somehow possible to take the top higher (raising your hand or stepping on something). Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Taken at 5:42am. Woke up at 4:45 am to reach this place before sunrise. Very subtle light IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Westpolderbrêge. 12-08-2020. (actm.) 04.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2020 at 15:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Westpolderbrêge. 12-08-2020. (actm.) 04.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Westpolderbrêge. 12-08-2020. (actm.) 04.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Netherlands
•  Info A bridge over the Broeresloot in beautiful morning light.
  All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Perhaps I would crop a bit of the sky because of symmetry, but let's wait what others say --Llez (talk) 15:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

• Agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Fairly simple composition that's nice, and the warm light that Agnes mentions in the nomination really sells me on this as an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Optimal conditions. --A.Savin 21:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Striking image -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support very good light conditions. --Ivar (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support It’s always the light ... --Aristeas (talk) 06:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Simple clean composition. Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support. Meiræ 21:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC).jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 22:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1700-1800
•  Info: The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC) by Gabriel de Saint-Aubin, circa 1763 – uploaded and nominated by Coffeeandcrumbs --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 22:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 22:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Like it. :) --Peulle (talk) 06:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cmao20 (talk) 14:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Buidhe (talk) 00:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Mexican clay skulls.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 19:16:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mexican clay skulls.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mexican clay skulls.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. You should mention whether this is in a museum (and if so, which one), a private collection or something you photographed at a shop or something. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Request hate to be that guy, but please provide copyright and authorship information for your subjects. --El Grafo (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Done El Grafo --Wilfredor (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

   Comment Surely El Grafo meant the copyright of the underlying artwork; see also COM:TOYS. --A.Savin 21:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

  Yes, I'm talking about the skulls here, not about the photo. See COM:DW. Don't know if they're supposed to be art, mass-produced decorative items or toys, but they are certainly not primarily utilitarian and above the threshold of originality. We can only keep them here if they're not subject to copyright for some reason, and in order for this to become FP this needs to be documented properly. --El Grafo (talk) 09:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

   Comment @Ikan Kekek & El Grafo There are unsigned pieces of a private collection in San Miguel Allende. As is almost always the case with Artesanías Mexicanas (Mexican curious) they are reinterpretations of very common cultural icons and I don´t think that they are truly original works. This type of figures can be found in just about any market in Mexico during Day of the Dead celebrations. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Cool. Please add that information to the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Copyright information for the original work still not added to the file page, and I'm not convinced by the rationale given above. --El Grafo (talk) 07:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

   Comment El Grafo I suggest you read Mexican law. Between the Law and your opinion, I choose the Law. Under your rationale just about every picture of any object that depicts cultural ideas should be then be deleted. Mexican law refers to this type of work derivative work and it lacks enough originality to be granted copyright, on top of it not being signed. This is one of the millions of variants of skulls that relate to Mexican culture and death, day of the dead celebrations, etc. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran2.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 16:51:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran2.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
•  Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Because of hiding big part of ceiling behind the chandelier, I took another picture that shows hidden section.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Outstanding quality as ever but the crops disturb me a bit. I'd rather see the whole circle of the dome rather than have it cut off in various places. Also the crops aren't quite symmetrical which is a bit disturbing. Still, the very high resolution and beautiful details make it FP for me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks dear Cmao20. I didn't crop the picture. The picture merged from 5 frames (50mp) that form a square with(more 100mp). I tried to capture the ceiling symmetrical but the Chandelier wasn't in the center. I could locate the Chandelier in the center and correct the ceiling Symmetry in the Photoshop, but If I had done that, the circle would cut more than this. I need to 17mm TS-E canon to capture monuments like this.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 17:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 17:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The crop is poor (exterior circle cropped off), the angle looks randomed (I'd have looked for some symmetry on left/right or top/bottom), there are halos around the grid of the windows at the bottom (which doesn't happen at the top) and both corners at the bottom are pretty blurry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm reluctant to oppose because the resolution is so high, as usual, but I agree with the criticisms of the crops (and I understand they're not technically crops, but we use that term as a convenient short hand for bits of a circle being omitted). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose bad positioning, missed center. --Mile (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

• I said before Mr Mile, I located in the center of monument but the Chandelier wasn't in the center.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Given the circumstances, the technical limitations are less than they might have been. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 11.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 15:44:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 11.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 11.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Abstain -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Solid QI but sorry, I think the composition pales in comparison to your other current nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Special architecture, nice viewpoint, pleasant light. A bit shrunk at the left, compared to the right, but overall great image in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Question Striking scene, but is there any way the building on the left could be sharpened? I may vote against if it can't be. Realistically, that level of unsharpness would probably make the picture less than one of the very best. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose IQ could be better, and weather too. Morning shot maybe. --Mile (talk) 07:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Basile Morin. Meiræ 21:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral Per pros and cons above. There is FP potential here, but I'm not convinced by the compo. To me the palace buildings shouts for a wide angle shot (getting closer to it). Poco a poco (talk) 10:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:"Capt. Della H. Raney, Army Nurse Corps, who now heads the nursing staff at the station hospital at Camp Beale, CA - NARA - 535942.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 09:16:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:"Capt. Della H. Raney, Army Nurse Corps, who now heads the nursing staff at the station hospital at Camp Beale, CA - NARA - 535942.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:"Capt. Della H. Raney, Army Nurse Corps, who now heads the nursing staff at the station hospital at Camp Beale, CA - NARA - 535942.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
•  Info Uncredited photographer - restored, uploaded, and - nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Info That's not a caption, that's her wooden name plaque rather cleverly positioned Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Kritzolina (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support That's a fairly gripping portrait. Her facial expression speaks for itself. Historically important, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Seven Pandas (talk) 10:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support as per Ikan --Isiwal (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Russischer Bär Euplagia quadripunctaria-20190808-RM-171229.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 08:39:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Russischer Bär Euplagia quadripunctaria-20190808-RM-171229.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Russischer Bär Euplagia quadripunctaria-20190808-RM-171229.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Noctuidae (Owlet Moths)
•  Info Jersey Tiger (Euplagia quadripunctaria) on the Friesener Warte. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 08:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ermell (talk) 08:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose One wing out of focus. English name is Jersey Tiger. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 02:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Patan Durbar Square-2644.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 17:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Patan Durbar Square-2644.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Patan Durbar Square-2644.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
•  Info created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Nice photo that conveys the bustling atmosphere of the place. But I think I'd prefer it if the crop were less tight at the bottom. Cmao20 (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent to see this kind of non-western atmosphere. Seeing this image gives me human warmth and hospitality. --Wilfredor (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Kritzolina (talk) 18:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Reminds me of a great visit there with Nepalese Wikipedians, but the bottom crop is not good. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Charlesjsharp I agree with you, but I also think that there is no way to cut this photo since it is a composition that never ends at the bottom --Wilfredor (talk) 02:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Charles. A bottom crop that ends arbitrarily on the ground would be much preferable. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Crop, bottom and right.--Peulle (talk) 06:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support To me the buildings are what dominates the image, and they should ... I really am not bothered by the crop. Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Daniel Case, that looks like a support argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Indeed it was ... that's what I get for doing this that late. Changed Daniel Case (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose It's a vibrant scene, but there's no clear main subject, and if the subject is the street itself then the composition doesn't feel like it balances the various pieces. The light grey structure to the left is very much sidelined, and its outline fights with the buildings seen beyond it on both sides. The long building on the right is interesting but not very prominent in the scene, and the same holds for the tall pagoda in the distance beyond it. Additionally, to my eye the image needs to be rotated about two degrees clockwise. --Bobulous (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment In this picture main subject is not just one building or street. This photo was taken from the terrace of small building as shown in this picture. And i think there is no way to crop this photo Here's some example: First Second from same photographer. Thank you Best regards -Bijay chaurasia (talk) 06:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I'm very much grateful to see such a beautiful holy photograph. I really don't see the crop or visitors as disturbing or not working. For me, it shows the beauty of the place and make me feels sacred. Additionally, top to mid view is really eye catching. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat ^{[ contribs | talk ]} 07:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Senden, Schloss Senden -- 2020 -- 0486-90.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 16:13:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Senden, Schloss Senden -- 2020 -- 0486-90.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Senden, Schloss Senden -- 2020 -- 0486-90.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 16:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 16:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very well executed --Wilfredor (talk) 17:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely reflections and very good quality and light. Cmao20 (talk) 17:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Question Is there a way to get the tip of the tower in the reflexion? Poco a poco (talk) 20:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

• I made some vertical adjustments. --XRay ^talk 04:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

• I see that you offered now a bit more of image at the bottom, which made it IMHO worse, as now the missing piece is smaller. Sorry, but that spot spoils the nom to me.  Oppose Poco a poco (talk) 10:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support nice composition — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Too bad the reflection of the tower isn't included, but quite pleasant, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Amir Pashaei (talk) 08:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:42, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 11:02, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very good, but the incomplete reflection spoils it for me. --Milseburg (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose More than the reflection, the tight crop at the top bothers me --Muhammad (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Muhammad (talk) 07:51, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Tight crop, yes, but that doesn't ruin this for me. Daniel Case (talk) 01:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Info @Poco a poco, Muhammad Mahdi Karim: I just added some space at the top. --XRay ^talk 13:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:WLE - 2020 - Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido - 04.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 14:17:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:WLE - 2020 - Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido - 04.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:WLE - 2020 - Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido - 04.jpg

683

2489

942

69

4294

2766

Strange lines?

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info created/uploaded by Moahim nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 14:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Second place awarded in Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Spain -- Ezarateesteban 14:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Question What are those lines (noted) in the foreground? They look too straight to be natural somehow. Cmao20 (talk) 17:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

• I checked the note - it is straight waterline. --Moahim (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

I don't know, I didn't notice of it Ezarateesteban 18:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

• •  Comment These are just cracks in the rock.--Moahim (talk) 18:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support OK, fair enough. Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

• It's a nice scene that's pretty well done, but the light conditions aren't ideal. I wonder if a little post-processing work with the tones could help... — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

• I tried to fix these problems. Check the new version.--Moahim (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Fine for me, maybe WB is slightly too blue and brightness could be raised a little. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too gray to be one of the best waterfall pictures on Commons, I think. I'd like to see this view in better light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

• Agree, the water, especially, is too gray -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 16:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File: Swami Agnivesh (2019).jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 17:58:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File: Swami Agnivesh (2019).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File: Swami Agnivesh (2019).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
•  Info Swami Agnivesh in 2019. Agnivesh recently died due to multiple organ failure. Created and uploaded by Mydreamsparrow - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 17:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 17:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose A sad recent loss, but the quality is not up to FP level, unfortunately. Straight forward portrait that's rather low resolution/sharpness. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  18:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above. Sounds like a great person, though. Please nominate at VIC, as the photo seems best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Rhododendrites.--Peulle (talk) 07:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support as creator - Thanks for the nomination Arion. - Mydreamsparrow (talk) 15:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Rhododendrites. He sounds like a tremendous person though, I hadn't heard of him before. Per Ikan would do well at VIC. Cmao20 (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose This looks like a great driver's license/ID photo. But that doesn't make it a featurable portrait. Daniel Case (talk) 14:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:2020-07-20-Alversteen-8761.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 17:42:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2020-07-20-Alversteen-8761.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2020-07-20-Alversteen-8761.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
•  Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Superbass (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The difference in brightness is very difficult to manage here. The burnt-out lights are disturbing. --Ermell (talk) 07:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks like a QI but lacks that certain something to impress me. --Peulle (talk) 12:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I dissent. The image quality is good and I like the light very much. Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose the sharpness is good enough, but the harsh light in the background and composition don't quite work for me. I appreciate the idea of balancing the rocks with the tree, but it just feels like the rocks are "facing" left, where there could be more room. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Of course I was hoping for broad support, and of course I think I took the best possible photo under the conditions on site :-) But I am very satisfied with the respectful tone of the critical or rejecting voices. Even if the picture does not become a featured one, I will keep this in good memory. --Superbass (talk) 07:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The blown highlights are not very well done. As Ermell says, it's difficult, but a successful trick is to underexpose - not only 1 EV, maybe 4 or 5 EV in that case. Example for comparison. Also mitigated wow factor in my view, but I could have remained neutral if the leaves were not burnt like now -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Nice idea, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technical issues per Ermell, but even without them this is just a picture of rocks balanced on each other in the woods that doesn't wow me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Lengurbill beach 19.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 12:30:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lengurbill beach 19.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lengurbill beach 19.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
•  Info created, uploaded & nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I'm not sure how this nomination will fare here, but I enjoy the peacefulness of the beach with the boat in the middleground and in fact center of the picture frame, half on sand and half on tide, rather than the foreground, with the clouds providing another horizontal above it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The subject is interesting, but the composition boring (too centered) and ligthing and quality are not extraordinary, it's also tilted (see sea horizon) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poco a poco (talk • contribs)
•  Support I like it a lot --Kritzolina (talk) 20:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The quality should be better. The sharpness is low and there are halos around some objects. --XRay ^talk 16:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per XRay, I like the composition though. Cmao20 (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Would have been better more tightly focused on the boat and the two guys at either end. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:AfricanKingCapek.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 10:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:AfricanKingCapek.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AfricanKingCapek.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings
•  Info created by Joseph Capek - uploaded by Jklamo - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Andrei (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good reproduction of an exemplary painting. --Aristeas (talk) 13:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

File:California Academy of Sciences San Francisco December 2016 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 06:47:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:California Academy of Sciences San Francisco December 2016 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:California Academy of Sciences San Francisco December 2016 HDR.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
•  Info The Twilight Zone at twilight -- all by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 09:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I remember when people went to museums. I remember going to this museum ... it was a simpler time then. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  13:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral Quality is good, wow factor low to me Poco a poco (talk) 14:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I'd suggest cropping out the sky and road (keep the sidewalk) but it's already very nice like this. - Benh (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I like the crop with the bands of road on the bottom and sky on the top. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Please do not crop the sky. --Aristeas (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose This will not affect the nomination but no wow for me. Good quality but not FP level visuals IMO --Muhammad (talk) 12:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Gymnadenia odoratissima - Niitvälja bog.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 05:11:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Gymnadenia odoratissima - Niitvälja bog.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gymnadenia odoratissima - Niitvälja bog.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae
•  Info all by Ivar (talk) 05:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Ahmad^talk 05:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Nice subject, nice bokeh but we have been spoilt here with crispy sharper images than this one Poco a poco (talk) 08:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Could be sharper, its static. But main oppose is due to background. Its like drawing. --Mile (talk) 11:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

• @PetarM: it's a natural background. This smooth effect comes along with macro photography, if you shoot very close to the small subject. --Ivar (talk) 12:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Weak support The photo could probably have been sharper. But I think it's a nice recording.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Poco and Famberhorst. Cmao20 (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Poco. The bar for flower images has been set pretty high. Daniel Case (talk) 15:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Broad Street Downtown Area in Nevada City, California.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 04:16:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Broad Street Downtown Area in Nevada City, California.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Broad Street Downtown Area in Nevada City, California.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United_States
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 09:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Charming small-town main street with evergreens. Just oozes atmosphere and a pleasant mood. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose For me the wow is insufficient, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 07:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I like the composition and light. It reminds me a lot of this FP, except while that one is quintessentially English, this is quintessentially Californian. Cmao20 (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support as per Cmao20 Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I have to agree with Peulle Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral A very pleasant scene, but low on wow in my opinion. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I see the idea, but while it makes a QI easily it just doesn't keep it together for FA. First, the light is a little harsh ... I know this may have been the only time of day you could get the buildings lit, but if that's so this is not the picture with taking for FA. Second, unlike the Diliff image that Cmao linked, the regularity of the buildings is not there in enough quantity to overcome all the distractions like the cars and the trees. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The parked cars on the right side serve no compositional purpose and should be cropped out (leaving sufficient space to the right of the moving cars). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, per others. --Milseburg (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates

File:Sunflower and a bee.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 19:17:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sunflower and a bee.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunflower and a bee.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
•  Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 19:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Cala Rajada na Ferradura escultura Joan Bennàssar-1371.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 16:45:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Cala Rajada na Ferradura escultura Joan Bennàssar-1371.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cala Rajada na Ferradura escultura Joan Bennàssar-1371.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
•  Info created & uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 16:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 16:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral I have nothing against the composition, but this sculpture is horrible and seems to be the product of another destructive restoration work --Wilfredor (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img71 Maçka Gondola.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 14:10:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img71 Maçka Gondola.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img71 Maçka Gondola.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Cableways
•  Info View of the Maçka Gondola in Istanbul, with Hilton Istanbul Bosphorus in the background ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 14:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 14:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The exposure has been well controlled, but the scene feels very cluttered to me, and the various lines all conflict with each other (the lines of the suspension cables, the lines of the buildings, and the lines of the trees bursting into the scene from all angles). --Bobulous (talk) 19:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Smoking, Bo-Kaap, Cape Town (P1060001).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 09:03:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Smoking, Bo-Kaap, Cape Town (P1060001).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Smoking, Bo-Kaap, Cape Town (P1060001).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info all by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 09:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- MB-one (talk) 09:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose nothing special --Nexo20 (talk) 16:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose This image doesn't work for me, unfortunately. The scene is pedestrian, the lone figure looks a little out of focus well before getting to 100%, the shop behind them is largely obscured and fairly gloomy, and the block wall framing it all is not pleasing the eye. --Bobulous (talk) 19:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Image:Kanadagans auf dem Raakmoorteich im Naturschutzgebiet Raakmoor.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 08:40:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/Image:Kanadagans auf dem Raakmoorteich im Naturschutzgebiet Raakmoor.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Kanadagans auf dem Raakmoorteich im Naturschutzgebiet Raakmoor.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
•  Info created by User:Käptn Klabauter - uploaded by Käptn Klabauter - nominated by Nexo20 -- Nexo20 (talk) 08:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Nexo20 (talk) 08:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose As much as I like the goose's pose, the rest of the composition is too distracting from the subject. --MB-one (talk) 09:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The green of the leaves looks somewhat unnatural to me, the saturation seems too high. What do other people think? --Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

• Yes, saturated colors and the blacks are too intense -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

• Weak  Support, pending any edits per Aristeas' point above. I really like how the goose is framed by that filigree of foliage, a growing trunk or two, a fallen trunk and the reflections. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blown highlights (chest) -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Mode Gakuen Cocoon Tower in the evening with blue sky Tokyo Japan.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 06:21:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mode Gakuen Cocoon Tower in the evening with blue sky Tokyo Japan.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mode Gakuen Cocoon Tower in the evening with blue sky Tokyo Japan.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Japan
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Nexo20 (talk) 08:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support simple and effective. --MB-one (talk) 09:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I like the tower and the dome - good current-day architecture, which is rare and nice to see. However, the overall composition is not great to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Collina presso Nagasaki, bozzetto di Alexandre Bailly, Marcel Jambon per Madama Butterfly (1906) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON000079 - Restoration.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 03:41:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Collina presso Nagasaki, bozzetto di Alexandre Bailly, Michel Jambon per Madama Butterfly (1906) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON000079 - Restoration.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Collina presso Nagasaki, bozzetto di Alexandre Bailly, Michel Jambon per Madama Butterfly (1906) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON000079 - Restoration.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment
•  Info created by Alexandre Bailly and Marcel Jambon - restored and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Info One of the first restorations - I think - from the recent collaboration with the Archivo Storico Ricordi. One issue: I'm pretty sure - and have sources to confirm - that it's actually Marcel Jambon - at least in modern spelling: back in the early 1900s it as a lot more common to change name spellings for different countries. I'm checking with the Wikimedian in Residence about that. It shouldn't matter at all, but would mean that this page and the file page will move to reflect that if it checks out. I'm listing by initials in the meantime. Edit:Yep. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support That's quite nice. I'm kind of astonished that someone would do such a nice watercolor of a stage design. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Different set designers used different media, but set designs, at least the old-school ones, could occasionally be stunning artworks their own right. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:360° panoramas Estonian University of Life Sciences, research.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 22:07:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:360° panoramas Estonian University of Life Sciences, research.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° panoramas Estonian University of Life Sciences, research.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
•  Info created by Lauri Veerde - uploaded by Eesti Maaülikool - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 22:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 22:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support First class. There is only a stitching error at the yellow sticking tape at the roof, but this is minimal. -- -donald- (talk) 06:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 07:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very eye catching. Sharp throughout the central areas, and pleasingly smooth in the areas unavoidably distorted by the 180° view. Well exposed despite the variety of lighting, and rich with interesting textures. --Bobulous (talk) 19:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Kehtna Kutsehariduskeskus 005-kokad pano.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 22:06:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kehtna Kutsehariduskeskus 005-kokad pano.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kehtna Kutsehariduskeskus 005-kokad pano.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
•  Info created by Lauri Veerde - uploaded & nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 22:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 22:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Awesome. High educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing to look at with the 360° viewer. Technically the weak side is a high level of noise in the 2D version, but considering the huge resolution (18,384 × 9,192 pixels), for an interior shot where the moving subjects are rather sharp and the DoF generous, I think 1600 ISO is forgivable. Very interesting document -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect. -- -donald- (talk) 06:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- I wish I could create such a spectacular panoramic! MartinD (talk) 07:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Really impressive, also really good image quality. --Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Absolutely brilliant. A fascinating scene which takes several minutes to fully explore. It's well exposed, and has nice bursts of colour in amongst the chrome. The image is surprisingly noisy at 100%, but by the time the image is stretched to 100% it would be absolutely huge (nearly seven [4K 34-inch] monitors high and more than seven wide) so I see no real problem there. I can easily imagine seeing this in the Picture Of The Day box on the main page. --Bobulous (talk) 19:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Rutherford Hill Wine Cave-1351.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 20:46:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rutherford Hill Wine Cave-1351.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rutherford Hill Wine Cave-1351.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United_States
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice long-exposure shot -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:St Mary le Strand Church from balcony, London, UK - Diliff.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 14:39:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:St Mary le Strand Church from balcony, London, UK - Diliff.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Mary le Strand Church from balcony, London, UK - Diliff.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#London
•  Info With its decorative Italianate interior inspired by the work of Roman sculptors such as Luigi Fontana, St Mary le Strand is one of London's most unusual and interesting churches (still more for being located in the middle of a traffic island). Constructed between 1714 and 1724, its Baroque styling and plastered ceiling were highly controversial for an English church. There is a more conventional pew-level view but I think this view from the balcony is better. created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Well balanced tones, given the range of lighting levels. Rich colours, and a very intricate and detailed venue. --Bobulous (talk) 20:29, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice composition, although the cutoff of the nearest chandelier is unfortunate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 02:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:SOB Re 456 Weissenbachviadukt Degersheim.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 13:58:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:SOB Re 456 Weissenbachviadukt Degersheim.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SOB Re 456 Weissenbachviadukt Degersheim.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
•  Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 13:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 14:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Wow-y enough for me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not for me, unfortunately. The train and bridge are a little small in the scene, the train seems somewhat overexposed, and the bare trees and straggly bits (fence posts?) in the bottom of the image keep distracting. Possibly a different crop and a tone curve adjustment would appease me, but let's see what others think. --Bobulous (talk) 20:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 22:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Bloem van gevlekt havikskruid (Hieracium maculatum). 02-09-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 04:41:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bloem van gevlekt havikskruid (Hieracium maculatum). 02-09-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloem van gevlekt havikskruid (Hieracium maculatum). 02-09-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg

• Gallery:Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
•  Info Flower of Hieracium maculatum. A rare species in the Netherlands. Focus stack of 11 photos.
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Seven Pandas (talk) 01:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Reichstagsgebäude, Berlin-Mitte, 170402, ako.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 17:58:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Reichstagsgebäude, Berlin-Mitte, 170402, ako.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reichstagsgebäude, Berlin-Mitte, 170402, ako.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
•  Info There are other FPs of the Reichstag building, but none from this angle. I like the early morning light and I think it's quite nice that both the German flags are blowing towards the camera. created by Code - uploaded by Code - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 00:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but I want to see the dome.--Claus 05:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

• Understandable, but my argument would be we already have good FPs where you can see the dome. I nominated this picture because it's something a little different. Cmao20 (talk) 16:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Striking contrast, colour, and texture. --Bobulous (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Bobulous --Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Moshe Ganbash - Shiviti - Google Art Project.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 16:45:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Moshe Ganbash - Shiviti - Google Art Project.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moshe Ganbash - Shiviti - Google Art Project.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Judaism
•  Info created by Moshe Ganbash - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 16:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Andrei (talk) 16:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cmao20 (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 00:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de San Carlos Borromeo, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 164-166 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 10:12:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Carlos Borromeo, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 164-166 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Carlos Borromeo, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 164-166 HDR.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Austria
•  Info Night view of the facade of St. Charles Church (Karlskirche), Vienna, Austria. The baroque church is dedicated to Charles Borromeo and is one of the city's greatest buildings. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 10:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 10:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Beautiful, but a little noisy in the sky. Could you work on that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

  Ikan Kekek:  Done Poco a poco (talk) 14:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks, much better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Strong support Nearly perfect for me. True, there is some sky noise, but it's still great for a night shot. The detail on the building and the light conditions are exceptional. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 00:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg official SCOTUS portrait.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 00:06:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg official SCOTUS portrait.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg official SCOTUS portrait.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
•  Info created by Steve Petteway uploaded by Gage - nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 00:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ezarateesteban 00:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Of course I see why you nominated this, with RBG having just passed away, but I think it's not an outstanding portrait in terms of image quality. There is quite a lot of colour noise and a large amount of JPEG artefacting which is a shame for a photo that is not especially large. For me it would be better to wait until emotions have died down a little over this sad event and see if there are better photos of Ms Ginsburg available. Cmao20 (talk) 01:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose RIP RBG, but not a great portrait of her. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not an outstanding portrait. --Gnosis (talk) 00:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Garzweiler surface mine Bucket-wheel excavator 2019 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 19:58:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Garzweiler surface mine Bucket-wheel excavator 2019 1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garzweiler surface mine Bucket-wheel excavator 2019 1.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
•  Info created & uploaded by Arne Müseler - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm not sure how I feel about the photo, overall, but I'm definitely feeling like I want a wider crop on the right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Dramatic photo although there is a bit of barrel distortion. Cmao20 (talk) 01:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 08:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The subject is original and the composition good but the quality is clearly below FP level. It's too grainy (visiblem above all in the sky), lacks some sharpness and needs some perspective adjustments to get verticals vertical. I'd change my vote if the issues are successfully addressed Poco a poco (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Looks like a top-down view to me. Doesn't make sense to fix the verticals in that case (I got the same remark in this nomination). Looking at the machine at full size, it's really tack sharp. Shot with an Hasselblad at 100 ISO. Apart from a very very little noise in the sky, I really don't see why the quality would be "clearly below FP" -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:26, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

• Indeed, the image quality looks fine to me. The grain is pretty minimal and not a big deal. And the excavator itself is really sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 17:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
• I was confused by this comment, thought it looked rather crappy for a high-class medium format camera – until I realized that that "Hasselblad" is the 1″ sensor on-board camera of the Mavic 2 Pro. Now it makes sense. Actually looks pretty good for a drone shot. --El Grafo (talk) 15:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support I didn't like this shot the first several times I looked at its thumbnail. But on filling the screen with it, it does keep drawing the eye to the dozens of nested structures hidden within. And to my eye the detail on the main body of the machine is crispy even at 100%. The ancillary body to the right is softer but still offers enough detail to show off yet more structures within this beast of a machine. I like the parallel bands of colour, and the textures in the sandy layer. So I've changed my mind: this does feel like a striking image. --Bobulous (talk) 20:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- MartinD (talk) 07:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Bridge at Makhtesh Ramon (40582).jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 16:54:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bridge at Makhtesh Ramon (40582).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bridge at Makhtesh Ramon (40582).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#Israel
•  Info A bridge along a cliff path, looking out to Makhtesh Ramon in the Mitzpe Ramon desert. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk |  16:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  16:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 21:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Really nice light. Cmao20 (talk) 01:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 08:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Andrei (talk) 08:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Not the nicest bridge I've ever seen but the scene, compo and light are nice Poco a poco (talk) 10:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support it looks like a apocalyptic scene --Wilfredor (talk) 17:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I keep coming back to this image, but I just can't get it to work for me. The bridge and walkway invite the question: what are they there for, where do they go? And the image doesn't answer that. The shot is sharp and well exposed, but the scene just doesn't fit together for me. --Bobulous (talk) 20:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

• I understand that you're looking for an answer from the image, but I'll add an answer in text form anyway: this is along the Israel National Trail at the edge of Makhtesh Ramon. Basically a cliffside path. The bridge, if I recall correctly, only serves to take you to the little lookout area on the other side of it (the little area pictured). It was entirely optional, which I was glad for because it was old and missing planks and bowing in the middle and kind of scary. So the answers to "what is it there for" and "where does it go" are there... they're just not very interesting. :) Mainly I just liked the scene/composition. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  20:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Neutral What a pity that the first pole is cut off (when the bridge is the main theme as the title says) --Llez (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Squirrel watching over the coast in La Jolla (70350).jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 14:41:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Squirrel watching over the coast in La Jolla (70350).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Squirrel watching over the coast in La Jolla (70350).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United_States
•  Info Squirrel watching over the beach from a nearby cliff, making sure everybody's ok. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The squirrel is looking the other way. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Only because I distracted him. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support We can see the squirrel's eye, so I think it's OK. Nice idea for a picture. Cmao20 (talk) 01:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Latzfonser Kreuz mit Dolomiten.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 12:48:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Latzfonser Kreuz mit Dolomiten.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Latzfonser Kreuz mit Dolomiten.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
•  Info Place of pilgrimage above Klausen in the Sarntal Alps. In the background the Dolomites. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Milseburg (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Well done, I think this is a really thoughtful and satisfying composition. Cmao20 (talk) 13:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support wow. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support My home --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. Perhaps WB is just a little too green. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice scene, great background Poco a poco (talk) 10:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Buidhe (talk) 01:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Ceiling of golden Iwan at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of golden Iwan at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of golden Iwan at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
•  Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support A tiny bit of blue CA on the top left though. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support but per KoH. This is great though, I love the gold. Cmao20 (talk) 00:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very large resolution, beautiful golden patterns, nice sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support, but please fix the CA per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks. CA fixed.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 13:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, good crop, the item presented as it is... FP. Poco a poco (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Basile and Poco. --Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 10:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support GRDN711 (talk) 04:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Buidhe (talk) 00:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Clapham Lodge.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 19:26:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Clapham Lodge.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clapham Lodge.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
•  Info created by User:Bobulous - uploaded by User:Bobulous - nominated by Bobulous -- Bobulous (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bobulous (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support good composition. --Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose A 3/4 backlit shot can often be quite effective, but here the stone wall blocks the composition and casts an undesirable shadow on the foreground pavement. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Welcome to FPC (as far as I know, i haven't seen you nominate before). I like the shot but I think it is for me a bit more QI than FP. The subject is IMO not really that outstanding and for a building that isn't that naturally impressive I would only support a photo shot under excellent light or really outstanding composition. I actually like the composition, but I think the light is a little bit less than ideal - per KoH the shadows caused by the backlighting are not that attractive for me. There is also a little bit of blue chromatic aberration in the branches at the top, though this is easily fixable and not the reason for my oppose. Please, keep trying at FPC - this is not too far off the standard. Cmao20 (talk) 00:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • @King of Hearts, Cmao20: Thank you for your reviews. The blurring of the branches at the very top of the image is not caused by CA, but by the extreme edge of a shifted lens (a Canon TS-E 24mm mk II, very possibly shifted to the maximum to give a 12mm rise). I don't believe that such loss of resolution can be fixed in post (but I am hoping Canon will soon release a newer model which exhibits this effect less severely). I did wonder if the backlighting would put off some people, but decided to nominate because my eye keeps getting caught by the soft glow of the building face even though it's in shade and competing with areas lit by direct sunlight. If anyone is interested, I could offer an alternative crop which removes most of the road, but I kept it originally because I liked the long shadows made by the gate in the low sun. --Bobulous (talk) 18:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I’m not at all sold on the composition, sorry. At least, I’d entirely crop out the foreground road. Then, I’d love to see more of the tree on the left, as a counterweight to the one on the right. --Kreuzschnabel 21:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Jacques Cartier 1851-1852.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:55:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Jacques Cartier 1851-1852.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jacques Cartier 1851-1852.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People
•  Info created by Théophile Hamel - uploaded and nominated by -- Wilfredor (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wilfredor (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Nice painting but IMO a little bit less sharp than many painting reproductions at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp enough for an FP reproduction of a painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Funeral for a friend.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Funeral for a friend.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Funeral for a friend.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Black clay folk art from Mexico depicting skeletons. Photo taken from a private collection in San Miguel Allende, Mexico. Arrangement by me. -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Next time you could take two pictures to prevent the DoF problem --Wilfredor (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
• Copyright of the figurines? It is clearly a derivative work. Renata3 (talk) 01:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
• Where is the manufacturer \ artist information?  Oppose unless we have that.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 12:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 03.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 03.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support A striking scene and mix of colour amid monochrome, with a beautiful mix of tones. --Bobulous (talk) 19:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Great idea with the multiple leading lines towards the top of the mountain. I do wish, however, that the closest pole on the right didn't intersect the mountain; a little forward (to get past it) or backward (to make it smaller in the frame) would do the trick. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Composition and colour work really well for me. Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely, great light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 10:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Bobulous and KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Buidhe (talk) 00:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Passageway - Funchal 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 12:06:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Passageway - Funchal 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Passageway - Funchal 01.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Other
•  Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I love it --Wilfredor (talk) 12:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice pic - finding beauty in decay. Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak Support Nice (it reminds me that composition) but underexposed in my view. Even the background is not so bright - Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't think it's comparable with that composition. The "dark" wall is not an external facade like in the other picture you mention but the back wall of a passage. This windowless passage is very dark. I had to brighten it up a bit, in the original shot the wall was even darker. The background is a narrow inner courtyard, surrounded by high walls with no direct light (and not a large park; it was a sunny day when the picture was taken). --Llez (talk) 01:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Both compositions are comparable. Not the same images, but two centered compositions with round door in the wall, and vegetation behind. (And this is the aspect I like).
• Now of course I notice the camera is located in a darker room. Still, overall the image is divided into two parts: 1) One very dark foreground 2) One grey background. And just a tiny luminous area at the top of the stairs. 90% of the surface is too dark. You're saying there was no direct light in this narrow courtyard, due to tall walls, and yes, unfortunately that's visible: the exposure is not well set in my view. Sorry but same problem as here before it was fixed. You can increase quite a lot the light of the whole image and create a more appealing appearance -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• OK now -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support per Cmao20. I would try Basile’s hint, but I already like the photo as it is. --Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Info I did my best. But I have put the original raw file online, perhaps someone tries to improve the picture even more, I didn't succeed. --Llez (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Just add +0.6 exposure in Lightroom and that's done IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• I tried it, but then is too much noise in the darker part. Could you try it and upload the result in the folder of the link? --Llez (talk) 17:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Sure,  Done You may want to adjust the noise level with the 2nd version (obtained with Topaz DeNoise AI) -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Many thanks, I uploaded the version improved by you --Llez (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice shot but could you denoise the hall in the background a bit? Look at the flowerlike pattern on the wall, it doesn't look good Poco a poco (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done --Llez (talk) 11:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition and good denoising. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de la Asunción de María, Kirchhaslach, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 48-50 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 09:38:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de la Asunción de María, Kirchhaslach, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 48-50 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de la Asunción de María, Kirchhaslach, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 48-50 HDR.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Germany
•  Info Pipe organ, apostle statues and ceiling of the Baroque church of the Assumption of Mary, Kirchhaslach, Germany. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 09:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 09:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Muhammad (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Really nice. Cmao20 (talk) 23:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very beautiful. --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Striking, sharp throughout, evenly lit, and rich with texture. --Bobulous (talk) 18:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Buidhe (talk) 00:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Crocifisso Giovanni Teutonico o Paolo Moerich Duomo di Salò.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 09:22:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Crocifisso Giovanni Teutonico o Paolo Moerich Duomo di Salò.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crocifisso Giovanni Teutonico o Paolo Moerich Duomo di Salò.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Italy
•  Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Strong support Utterly beautiful. And something a bit new in the church-interior genre. Cmao20 (talk) 23:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The light makes the sculpture appear very 3-dimensional, beautiful colour contrast between the warm tones of the wood and the bluish background. --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very rich scene. It feels like the lens focus is behind the eyes very slightly, but the face is still sharp and even the nearest hand is clear enough when viewed pixel-for-pixel. The main object is nicely framed by the background, which is compelling and is blurred just enough to show detail without stealing the scene, helped by the good contrast in brightness between foreground and background. --Bobulous (talk) 18:59, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:White and golden graves in a Buddhist cemetery at sunrise in Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 00:35:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:White and golden graves in a Buddhist cemetery at sunrise in Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:White and golden graves in a Buddhist cemetery at sunrise in Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Laos
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment To my eye, this looks like it needs to be rotated clockwise by somewhere between one and two degrees. --Bobulous (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

• Interesting consideration, however, none of these graves are exactly vertical, and the ground itself is curved. At full size, it's visible some are leaning right, and some are leaning left. Rotating will increase the angle of the grave most at the right in the foreground, that is already slightly leaning CW. Currently the walls of the building in the background are vertical. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The quality is good and the item interesting but the light and compo are not at FP level to me, sorry. Probably golden hour light would work better here, about the compo, I'm not sure, maybe it somehow possible to take the top higher (raising your hand or stepping on something). Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Taken at 5:42am. Woke up at 4:45 am to reach this place before sunrise. Very subtle light IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Westpolderbrêge. 12-08-2020. (actm.) 04.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2020 at 15:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Westpolderbrêge. 12-08-2020. (actm.) 04.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Westpolderbrêge. 12-08-2020. (actm.) 04.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Netherlands
•  Info A bridge over the Broeresloot in beautiful morning light.
  All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Perhaps I would crop a bit of the sky because of symmetry, but let's wait what others say --Llez (talk) 15:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

• Agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Fairly simple composition that's nice, and the warm light that Agnes mentions in the nomination really sells me on this as an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Optimal conditions. --A.Savin 21:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Striking image -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support very good light conditions. --Ivar (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support It’s always the light ... --Aristeas (talk) 06:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Simple clean composition. Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support. Meiræ 21:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC).jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 22:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1700-1800
•  Info: The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC) by Gabriel de Saint-Aubin, circa 1763 – uploaded and nominated by Coffeeandcrumbs --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 22:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 22:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Like it. :) --Peulle (talk) 06:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cmao20 (talk) 14:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Buidhe (talk) 00:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Mexican clay skulls.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 19:16:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mexican clay skulls.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mexican clay skulls.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. You should mention whether this is in a museum (and if so, which one), a private collection or something you photographed at a shop or something. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Request hate to be that guy, but please provide copyright and authorship information for your subjects. --El Grafo (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Done El Grafo --Wilfredor (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

   Comment Surely El Grafo meant the copyright of the underlying artwork; see also COM:TOYS. --A.Savin 21:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

  Yes, I'm talking about the skulls here, not about the photo. See COM:DW. Don't know if they're supposed to be art, mass-produced decorative items or toys, but they are certainly not primarily utilitarian and above the threshold of originality. We can only keep them here if they're not subject to copyright for some reason, and in order for this to become FP this needs to be documented properly. --El Grafo (talk) 09:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

   Comment @Ikan Kekek & El Grafo There are unsigned pieces of a private collection in San Miguel Allende. As is almost always the case with Artesanías Mexicanas (Mexican curious) they are reinterpretations of very common cultural icons and I don´t think that they are truly original works. This type of figures can be found in just about any market in Mexico during Day of the Dead celebrations. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Cool. Please add that information to the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Copyright information for the original work still not added to the file page, and I'm not convinced by the rationale given above. --El Grafo (talk) 07:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

   Comment El Grafo I suggest you read Mexican law. Between the Law and your opinion, I choose the Law. Under your rationale just about every picture of any object that depicts cultural ideas should be then be deleted. Mexican law refers to this type of work derivative work and it lacks enough originality to be granted copyright, on top of it not being signed. This is one of the millions of variants of skulls that relate to Mexican culture and death, day of the dead celebrations, etc. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran2.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 16:51:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran2.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
•  Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Because of hiding big part of ceiling behind the chandelier, I took another picture that shows hidden section.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Outstanding quality as ever but the crops disturb me a bit. I'd rather see the whole circle of the dome rather than have it cut off in various places. Also the crops aren't quite symmetrical which is a bit disturbing. Still, the very high resolution and beautiful details make it FP for me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks dear Cmao20. I didn't crop the picture. The picture merged from 5 frames (50mp) that form a square with(more 100mp). I tried to capture the ceiling symmetrical but the Chandelier wasn't in the center. I could locate the Chandelier in the center and correct the ceiling Symmetry in the Photoshop, but If I had done that, the circle would cut more than this. I need to 17mm TS-E canon to capture monuments like this.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 17:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 17:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The crop is poor (exterior circle cropped off), the angle looks randomed (I'd have looked for some symmetry on left/right or top/bottom), there are halos around the grid of the windows at the bottom (which doesn't happen at the top) and both corners at the bottom are pretty blurry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm reluctant to oppose because the resolution is so high, as usual, but I agree with the criticisms of the crops (and I understand they're not technically crops, but we use that term as a convenient short hand for bits of a circle being omitted). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose bad positioning, missed center. --Mile (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

• I said before Mr Mile, I located in the center of monument but the Chandelier wasn't in the center.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Given the circumstances, the technical limitations are less than they might have been. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 11.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 15:44:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 11.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 11.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Abstain -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Solid QI but sorry, I think the composition pales in comparison to your other current nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Special architecture, nice viewpoint, pleasant light. A bit shrunk at the left, compared to the right, but overall great image in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Question Striking scene, but is there any way the building on the left could be sharpened? I may vote against if it can't be. Realistically, that level of unsharpness would probably make the picture less than one of the very best. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose IQ could be better, and weather too. Morning shot maybe. --Mile (talk) 07:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Basile Morin. Meiræ 21:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral Per pros and cons above. There is FP potential here, but I'm not convinced by the compo. To me the palace buildings shouts for a wide angle shot (getting closer to it). Poco a poco (talk) 10:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:"Capt. Della H. Raney, Army Nurse Corps, who now heads the nursing staff at the station hospital at Camp Beale, CA - NARA - 535942.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 09:16:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:"Capt. Della H. Raney, Army Nurse Corps, who now heads the nursing staff at the station hospital at Camp Beale, CA - NARA - 535942.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:"Capt. Della H. Raney, Army Nurse Corps, who now heads the nursing staff at the station hospital at Camp Beale, CA - NARA - 535942.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
•  Info Uncredited photographer - restored, uploaded, and - nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Info That's not a caption, that's her wooden name plaque rather cleverly positioned Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Kritzolina (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support That's a fairly gripping portrait. Her facial expression speaks for itself. Historically important, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Seven Pandas (talk) 10:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support as per Ikan --Isiwal (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Russischer Bär Euplagia quadripunctaria-20190808-RM-171229.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 08:39:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Russischer Bär Euplagia quadripunctaria-20190808-RM-171229.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Russischer Bär Euplagia quadripunctaria-20190808-RM-171229.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Noctuidae (Owlet Moths)
•  Info Jersey Tiger (Euplagia quadripunctaria) on the Friesener Warte. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 08:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ermell (talk) 08:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose One wing out of focus. English name is Jersey Tiger. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 02:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Patan Durbar Square-2644.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 17:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Patan Durbar Square-2644.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Patan Durbar Square-2644.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
•  Info created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Nice photo that conveys the bustling atmosphere of the place. But I think I'd prefer it if the crop were less tight at the bottom. Cmao20 (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent to see this kind of non-western atmosphere. Seeing this image gives me human warmth and hospitality. --Wilfredor (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Kritzolina (talk) 18:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Reminds me of a great visit there with Nepalese Wikipedians, but the bottom crop is not good. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Charlesjsharp I agree with you, but I also think that there is no way to cut this photo since it is a composition that never ends at the bottom --Wilfredor (talk) 02:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Charles. A bottom crop that ends arbitrarily on the ground would be much preferable. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Crop, bottom and right.--Peulle (talk) 06:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support To me the buildings are what dominates the image, and they should ... I really am not bothered by the crop. Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Daniel Case, that looks like a support argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Indeed it was ... that's what I get for doing this that late. Changed Daniel Case (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose It's a vibrant scene, but there's no clear main subject, and if the subject is the street itself then the composition doesn't feel like it balances the various pieces. The light grey structure to the left is very much sidelined, and its outline fights with the buildings seen beyond it on both sides. The long building on the right is interesting but not very prominent in the scene, and the same holds for the tall pagoda in the distance beyond it. Additionally, to my eye the image needs to be rotated about two degrees clockwise. --Bobulous (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment In this picture main subject is not just one building or street. This photo was taken from the terrace of small building as shown in this picture. And i think there is no way to crop this photo Here's some example: First Second from same photographer. Thank you Best regards -Bijay chaurasia (talk) 06:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I'm very much grateful to see such a beautiful holy photograph. I really don't see the crop or visitors as disturbing or not working. For me, it shows the beauty of the place and make me feels sacred. Additionally, top to mid view is really eye catching. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat ^{[ contribs | talk ]} 07:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Senden, Schloss Senden -- 2020 -- 0486-90.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 16:13:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Senden, Schloss Senden -- 2020 -- 0486-90.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Senden, Schloss Senden -- 2020 -- 0486-90.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 16:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 16:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very well executed --Wilfredor (talk) 17:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely reflections and very good quality and light. Cmao20 (talk) 17:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Question Is there a way to get the tip of the tower in the reflexion? Poco a poco (talk) 20:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

• I made some vertical adjustments. --XRay ^talk 04:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

• I see that you offered now a bit more of image at the bottom, which made it IMHO worse, as now the missing piece is smaller. Sorry, but that spot spoils the nom to me.  Oppose Poco a poco (talk) 10:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support nice composition — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Too bad the reflection of the tower isn't included, but quite pleasant, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Amir Pashaei (talk) 08:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:42, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 11:02, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very good, but the incomplete reflection spoils it for me. --Milseburg (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose More than the reflection, the tight crop at the top bothers me --Muhammad (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Muhammad (talk) 07:51, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Tight crop, yes, but that doesn't ruin this for me. Daniel Case (talk) 01:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Info @Poco a poco, Muhammad Mahdi Karim: I just added some space at the top. --XRay ^talk 13:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:WLE - 2020 - Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido - 04.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 14:17:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:WLE - 2020 - Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido - 04.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:WLE - 2020 - Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido - 04.jpg

683

2489

942

69

4294

2766

Strange lines?

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info created/uploaded by Moahim nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 14:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Second place awarded in Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Spain -- Ezarateesteban 14:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Question What are those lines (noted) in the foreground? They look too straight to be natural somehow. Cmao20 (talk) 17:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

• I checked the note - it is straight waterline. --Moahim (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

I don't know, I didn't notice of it Ezarateesteban 18:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

• •  Comment These are just cracks in the rock.--Moahim (talk) 18:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support OK, fair enough. Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

• It's a nice scene that's pretty well done, but the light conditions aren't ideal. I wonder if a little post-processing work with the tones could help... — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

• I tried to fix these problems. Check the new version.--Moahim (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Fine for me, maybe WB is slightly too blue and brightness could be raised a little. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too gray to be one of the best waterfall pictures on Commons, I think. I'd like to see this view in better light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

• Agree, the water, especially, is too gray -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 16:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File: Swami Agnivesh (2019).jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 17:58:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File: Swami Agnivesh (2019).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File: Swami Agnivesh (2019).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
•  Info Swami Agnivesh in 2019. Agnivesh recently died due to multiple organ failure. Created and uploaded by Mydreamsparrow - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 17:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 17:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose A sad recent loss, but the quality is not up to FP level, unfortunately. Straight forward portrait that's rather low resolution/sharpness. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  18:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above. Sounds like a great person, though. Please nominate at VIC, as the photo seems best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Rhododendrites.--Peulle (talk) 07:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support as creator - Thanks for the nomination Arion. - Mydreamsparrow (talk) 15:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Rhododendrites. He sounds like a tremendous person though, I hadn't heard of him before. Per Ikan would do well at VIC. Cmao20 (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose This looks like a great driver's license/ID photo. But that doesn't make it a featurable portrait. Daniel Case (talk) 14:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:2020-07-20-Alversteen-8761.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 17:42:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2020-07-20-Alversteen-8761.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2020-07-20-Alversteen-8761.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
•  Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Superbass (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The difference in brightness is very difficult to manage here. The burnt-out lights are disturbing. --Ermell (talk) 07:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks like a QI but lacks that certain something to impress me. --Peulle (talk) 12:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I dissent. The image quality is good and I like the light very much. Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose the sharpness is good enough, but the harsh light in the background and composition don't quite work for me. I appreciate the idea of balancing the rocks with the tree, but it just feels like the rocks are "facing" left, where there could be more room. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Of course I was hoping for broad support, and of course I think I took the best possible photo under the conditions on site :-) But I am very satisfied with the respectful tone of the critical or rejecting voices. Even if the picture does not become a featured one, I will keep this in good memory. --Superbass (talk) 07:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The blown highlights are not very well done. As Ermell says, it's difficult, but a successful trick is to underexpose - not only 1 EV, maybe 4 or 5 EV in that case. Example for comparison. Also mitigated wow factor in my view, but I could have remained neutral if the leaves were not burnt like now -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Nice idea, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technical issues per Ermell, but even without them this is just a picture of rocks balanced on each other in the woods that doesn't wow me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Lengurbill beach 19.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 12:30:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lengurbill beach 19.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lengurbill beach 19.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
•  Info created, uploaded & nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I'm not sure how this nomination will fare here, but I enjoy the peacefulness of the beach with the boat in the middleground and in fact center of the picture frame, half on sand and half on tide, rather than the foreground, with the clouds providing another horizontal above it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The subject is interesting, but the composition boring (too centered) and ligthing and quality are not extraordinary, it's also tilted (see sea horizon) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poco a poco (talk • contribs)
•  Support I like it a lot --Kritzolina (talk) 20:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The quality should be better. The sharpness is low and there are halos around some objects. --XRay ^talk 16:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per XRay, I like the composition though. Cmao20 (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Would have been better more tightly focused on the boat and the two guys at either end. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:AfricanKingCapek.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 10:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:AfricanKingCapek.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AfricanKingCapek.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings
•  Info created by Joseph Capek - uploaded by Jklamo - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Andrei (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good reproduction of an exemplary painting. --Aristeas (talk) 13:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

File:California Academy of Sciences San Francisco December 2016 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 06:47:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:California Academy of Sciences San Francisco December 2016 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:California Academy of Sciences San Francisco December 2016 HDR.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
•  Info The Twilight Zone at twilight -- all by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 09:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I remember when people went to museums. I remember going to this museum ... it was a simpler time then. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  13:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral Quality is good, wow factor low to me Poco a poco (talk) 14:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I'd suggest cropping out the sky and road (keep the sidewalk) but it's already very nice like this. - Benh (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I like the crop with the bands of road on the bottom and sky on the top. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Please do not crop the sky. --Aristeas (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose This will not affect the nomination but no wow for me. Good quality but not FP level visuals IMO --Muhammad (talk) 12:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Gymnadenia odoratissima - Niitvälja bog.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 05:11:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Gymnadenia odoratissima - Niitvälja bog.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gymnadenia odoratissima - Niitvälja bog.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae
•  Info all by Ivar (talk) 05:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Ahmad^talk 05:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Nice subject, nice bokeh but we have been spoilt here with crispy sharper images than this one Poco a poco (talk) 08:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Could be sharper, its static. But main oppose is due to background. Its like drawing. --Mile (talk) 11:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

• @PetarM: it's a natural background. This smooth effect comes along with macro photography, if you shoot very close to the small subject. --Ivar (talk) 12:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Weak support The photo could probably have been sharper. But I think it's a nice recording.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Poco and Famberhorst. Cmao20 (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Poco. The bar for flower images has been set pretty high. Daniel Case (talk) 15:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Broad Street Downtown Area in Nevada City, California.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 04:16:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Broad Street Downtown Area in Nevada City, California.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Broad Street Downtown Area in Nevada City, California.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United_States
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 09:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Charming small-town main street with evergreens. Just oozes atmosphere and a pleasant mood. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose For me the wow is insufficient, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 07:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I like the composition and light. It reminds me a lot of this FP, except while that one is quintessentially English, this is quintessentially Californian. Cmao20 (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support as per Cmao20 Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I have to agree with Peulle Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral A very pleasant scene, but low on wow in my opinion. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I see the idea, but while it makes a QI easily it just doesn't keep it together for FA. First, the light is a little harsh ... I know this may have been the only time of day you could get the buildings lit, but if that's so this is not the picture with taking for FA. Second, unlike the Diliff image that Cmao linked, the regularity of the buildings is not there in enough quantity to overcome all the distractions like the cars and the trees. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The parked cars on the right side serve no compositional purpose and should be cropped out (leaving sufficient space to the right of the moving cars). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, per others. --Milseburg (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

タイムテーブル (推薦から5日後)

Wed 16 Sep → Mon 21 Sep
Thu 17 Sep → Tue 22 Sep
Fri 18 Sep → Wed 23 Sep
Sat 19 Sep → Thu 24 Sep
Sun 20 Sep → Fri 25 Sep
Mon 21 Sep → Sat 26 Sep

タイムテーブル (推薦から10日後)

Fri 11 Sep → Mon 21 Sep
Sat 12 Sep → Tue 22 Sep
Sun 13 Sep → Wed 23 Sep
Mon 14 Sep → Thu 24 Sep
Tue 15 Sep → Fri 25 Sep
Wed 16 Sep → Sat 26 Sep
Thu 17 Sep → Sun 27 Sep
Fri 18 Sep → Mon 28 Sep
Sat 19 Sep → Tue 29 Sep
Sun 20 Sep → Wed 30 Sep
Mon 21 Sep → Thu 01 Oct