Commons:Administrators' noticeboard

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reportswikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergencywikimedia.org.
Vandalism ^{[new section]}	User problems ^{[new section]}	Blocks and protections ^{[new section]}	Other ^{[new section]}
Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.	Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.	Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.	Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.
Archives
14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1	89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1	29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1	82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

^{Translate this page}

Note

Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
Notify the user(s) concerned. {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN|thread=|reason=}} is available for this.
Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.

Image displaying issue[edit]

I recently uploaded a new version of a file, but it is incorrectly displayed on a page in the history block. Black background instead of some parts of the SVG file. To create the file, I used CorelDraw 2020 (22.0.0.412) x64. What should I do? Need instruction or help from experienced project participants. file:RU COA Lunin.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legalwizard 2018 (talk • contribs) 06:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

The blocking of User:吳哲源 and User:Oooptt[edit]

Dear 1989, I’m the professor of Physics at University in Taiwan. I have a team to execute the project about Wikimedia Commons. I’m sorry for that we neglected and violated the policies of Wikimedia Commons. In the beginning, we wanted to contribute Wikimedia Commons some physics educating files which are made by teachers and registered a shared-account 彰師大物理實驗室 (彰師大 = NCUE, 物理 = Phsics, 實驗室 = Laboratory. So the full name means Physics Lab of NCUE.) to upload all files. After 彰師大物理實驗室 being blocked and all files being deleted by copyrights, we thought if all files are uploaded by our own author (including 吳仲卿, 呂承新, 吳哲源, and Oooptt), it may work. We all use the same computer and share the same IP. However, all of us are blocked again as we share the same IP. Under the help of Reke, the staff of Wikimedia Taiwan, we know the policies of Wikimedia ,and we will cooperate with WMTW from now on. Would you please unblock 吳哲源 and Oooptt) and allow us use the same computer (IP) to upload files in the future? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 吳仲卿 (talk • contribs)

Excessive spam due to sheer number of edits involved in adding structured data[edit]

BotMultichill is creating an enormous quantity of watchlist notification email due to its task of adding structured data to apparently every image on Commons. There are several complaints about this on Multichill's talk page so clearly I'm not the only one annoyed. I'm not suggesting this is in any way Multichill's fault or that they have personally done something wrong, but I don't think it's acceptable to generate this quantity of email for a planned, non-urgent task. Could I suggest that in future such tasks be carried on the server side in one go with a database query, or something like that, and a single email per user sent out to notify them? Receiving this large quantity of watchlist emails spread over the course of several days is highly disruptive to people's inboxes and should have been avoided.

I'm aware, having read the discussion, that there is an option to filter bot edits from your watchlist, but that's not something which is widely known. Also I don't believe every single Commons user should be expected to change a setting to mitigate an email storm which was nothing to do with them! Many thanks, GKFX^talk 14:24, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

I myself take the opportunity to add the structured information to the images on my watchlist whenever BotMultichill has done a run and I see my images pop up on y watchlist. The bot picks up all of the metadata of the image, but not (yet?) the subject or the items on display, which is actually the interesting part of combining both the databases of Wikidata and Commons. The bot has been doing more then I could handle the past few days, and maybe the emails could become recognised as spam by the email systems as well, which would not be a good thing.

For the moment, you could turn notification by email off in your settings, but indeed: BotMultichill will be editing 60 million files, so a different solution is welcome. Ciell (talk) 14:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Where, when, and by whom was this task approved? Why is that not noted on the bot's user page? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 15:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

I'm looking at bot requests at Commons:Bots/Requests/BotMultichillT, and Commons:Bots/Requests/BotMultichill. I'm not seeing anything about modifying structured data (all the comments are from 2007-2008). --William Graham (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

@Multichill: Please stop having any of your bots execute unapproved tasks. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 18:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Do you volunteer to add the information manually? If structured data is approved by the community then it is logic that bots will add it if possible. --MGA73 (talk) 19:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

@MGA73: No, but I'm not about to have my bot do it in an unapproved manner, either. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 19:18, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: One of the purposes of making a bot request is to make sure 1) that operater is able to do the task without messing things up and 2) that the taks is useful. I'm sure crats know what BotMultichill does and I'm sure that if any of them would like for Multichill to make a formal request then they wuld have just asked. I'm also sure that the request would be approved. So there is no reason for you to order Multichill to stop his bot. --MGA73 (talk) 19:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

@MGA73: "Messing things up" can be interpreted rather broadly and I would say that the current email storm counts as messing something up. There was in 2018 a similar discussion at Wikipedia [1] which discussed the total labour cost of bots sending large numbers of messages. In short asking very large numbers of people to read pointless, bot-generated messages is a waste of their valuable time, on the order of thousands of hours of work. For an order-of-magnitude estimate of the value of this human labour, assuming every image gets an edit, 64,145,000 images × 1 second/image average reading time = 17,818 hours of labour, which would cost you £155,000 at the UK minimum wage. That is why these things should be discussed before being set off. GKFX^talk 19:41, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

@GKFX: I do of course not mind that users ask first because thats the standard procedure. But a similar bot Commons:Bots/Requests/SchlurcherBot9 was approved with no problems so I think that demanding a stop is a bit much. I'm sure that there was a discussen about structured data when it was implemented and I think that everyone knew that implementing it would mean that there will be a lot of work and edits. About mails it is possible to disable while the bot works on the files. Things will be crazy for a week, a month or how long it will take to work on the files. --MGA73 (talk) 20:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

@MGA73:, "Things will be crazy for a week, a month or how long it will take to work on the files" is drastically underestimating the disruption this is going to cause. A glance at its contribution history shows that the bot is making about 200 edits per minute. Assuming the bot runs 24/7 without a break (possible), that there are no changes to files/data or additional changes that mean some files need do-overs (unlikely), and that no further images are added to Commons in the meantime (impossible), that means this is going to go on until April 2021 at the earliest. — iridescent 20:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

@Iridescent: I got it to over 350 edits per minute so my calculations say that it will go faster than what you estimate. Many of the files are uploaded with bots so they will not care about the "spam". I do not know exactly how the bot decide the order to work on the images but I doubt that anyone have all 60M files on their watchlist. Personally I only have 52,853 on my list. So when I said a week or a month or whatever I did that because I assumed that most of us will only be "spammed" for a shorter period of time. After that there will be fewer edits. --MGA73 (talk) 21:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

@MGA73: I did not "order Multichill to stop his bot", I politely requested. In Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-echo, some may want to opt for daily or weekly summaries of notifications. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 20:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: My bad, I read it as an order. --MGA73 (talk) 20:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

If you have large numbers of items on your watchlist, why on earth are you receiving watchlist emails? Yes that bot is sod-off annoying, and thus I have stopped my watchlist showing bot edits. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

BotMultichillT is doing it, too. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 21:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

How do I remove BotMultichillT from my watch list? I'm pretty sure I *used* to have bots not visible on my watch list years ago... Now there are hundreds of BotMultichillT edits for every other edit, and try as I might I know I'm missing things that shouldn't be overlooked. (I've tried editing my watch list multiple times without success over the past few weeks. I just spent half an hour looking for something to help with watch list editing... which brings up a related point: If there is not a page to help users with their watch list, there should be, and if there is, searching for "Help Watchlist" or "Commons Watchlist" should be able to find it, at least with a redirect.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

@Infrogmation: I have made Help:Watchlist, as a soft-redirect to the relevant docs on Mediawiki.org. Jean-Fred (talk) 10:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

@Infrogmation: Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-watchlist and check "Hide bot edits from the watchlist". Multichill (talk) 20:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

I must have missed a ping. I can't alter people's watchlist settings so I can't help them with that. So yes, this will hurt a bit, but it's like pulling off a bandage: It will hurt much longer if you do it slowly. You can see progress at User:Multichill/Structured data progress. Currently we are at around 20M files with license of about a total around 50M. Most will probably be done in about 6 weeks. Multichill (talk) 19:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Setting you preferences right at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-watchlist is important. You do not want to get emails about each watchlist change. You should stop watching bots you do not want to see a lot of changes. Also I heard that you can turn of edits of individual users by adding the JavaScript below to your common.js

$(document).ready($('.mw-special-Watchlist .mw-changeslist-line .mw-userlink[href="/wiki/User:BOTNAME"]').parent().parent().css("display", "none"));

Just change BOTNAME to the username of the actual bot. --Jarekt (talk) 00:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Diamond League[edit]

The 3 'Calendar' images uploaded from World Athletics to Category:IAAF Diamond League, are they not copyrighted? Ssu (talk) 12:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Likely not: {{Pd-ineligible}} Ruslik0 (talk) 19:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Assistance from a new administrator[edit]

A conflict has arisen with the administrator User:Nat because I previously uploaded some images that someone had cataloged them for violation of copyright, and a space for discussion was opened, I previously do not object, if the images do not comply with the conditions of Commons, the Images must be eliminated, the problem is that the administrator is not in the capacity to clearly define and textualize the situation in the clearest possible way to the questions asked [2]. Many users, and I am not referring precisely to me, but not all of us are up to date and totally soaked with the conditions of Commons and other platforms because they are quite a lot and need a lot of reading. But it is annoying and in bad taste that the "administrator" uses bold phrases [3], when Commons itself asks that it not be used COM:TALK, and indirectly uses insults or if they are not to such an extent, at least they offend any user that they treat it that way [4]. --P Cesar Maldonado (talk) 20:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Note This is an attempt to fork an on-going discussion taking place here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
In no way The administrator started the other discussion under another vision. She thinks the opening discussion process was "ridiculous" [5]--P Cesar Maldonado (talk) 21:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

@P Cesar Maldonado:

Done, closed by @Эlcobbola, Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 23:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Viewing deleted photos[edit]

I guess I should know this - is there a tool to view deleted content? Gbawden (talk)`

@Gbawden: No, admins can view it onwiki. You'll see (view/restore) button in the end of a deletion log of a page you want to view or you can just go to Special:Undelete and type the page name. See this for example, if you want to see text go to Page history section and tap on the timestamp of the revision you want to see and if you want to see file go to File history section and do the same. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks thats what I thought Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

User:MGA73[edit]

Moin - ist bitte jemand bereit und in der Lage den Admin User:MGA73 davon abzuhalten, den SVG-Test zig-fach zu zerschießen? -- MaxxL - talk 18:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

@MaxxL: Hallo! I have a talk page and you are welcome to leave me a message there. :-) --MGA73 (talk) 18:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Das werde ich bestimmt nicht machen, denn Deine Bots sind das Problem. Schalte die fehlerhaften Bots einfach ab. -- MaxxL - talk 18:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

How was the last edit related to buggy bots? If bots are a problem, report the bots, please.
Acagastya (talk) 18:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Seit dem 7. November kämpft der User immer wieder mit seinem Bot, der die unsinnigsten Edits auf der SVG-Testseite veranstaltet. -- MaxxL - talk 20:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

@MaxxL: It is not a bot. It is a script that is used by many users when they review the license of files in Category:License review needed. You can see some of the things that have been tested and changed on MediaWiki talk:Gadget-LicenseReview.js. The file is called "test" and that is why I used that file to test edits. --MGA73 (talk) 20:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

It's not clear what about this requires administrator assistance. File:Test.svg is a test file, so it should be expected to have many unnecessary edits. I'd advise discussing this with MGA73 directly and coming back here only if the issue can't be resolved that way. clpo13_(talk) 20:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Test are accepted as far as the former status is reestablished after the test. If a mess is left behind the action is imcomplete and not acceptable. -- MaxxL - talk 20:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Feel free to revert then, @MaxxL:. A test photo is what one would use sandbox for -- but some scripts do not work/aren't supposed to work in other namespaces. Test.svg isn't use anywhere. It is possible you are getting too many notifications because the page is in your watchlist? Or do you object the usage of test files as a sandbox?
Acagastya (talk) 03:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

@MaxxL: I did not see "the mess" as a big problem because the file is a test but if you do I will try to remember to clean up faster in future. --MGA73 (talk) 05:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

@Acagastya: - This file as described in the coloured box is to test SVG-Code only. To test scripts, bots and templates there are other locations.

@MGA73: - Just to avoid confusion i would appreciate if you execute your script test somewhere else. The "me4ss" was that the instruction how to use this test file were overwritten by you which is confusing average users. MaxxL - talk 13:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

@MaxxL: The name "test" clearly indicate that the file is used for tests so no average user should be surprised that the file is being used for test purposes. So far you are the only user that complained about it. So my guess that the average user do not care. Personally I do not care much about if the file i test is a jpg or a svg or whatever. Would you be happy if I use File: JPG Test.jpg instead? --MGA73 (talk) 16:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification of global ban proposal who were active on this wiki (このウィキでアクティブだったグローバル禁止提案の通知)[edit]

This is a notification of global ban discussion per the global ban policy.

これは、グローバル禁止ポリシーに基づくグローバル禁止議論に関する通知です。

My regards, SMB9 9thx uh~~kay!! 📸 06:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

But this account is already globally locked since November 2019.[6] --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, but i decided to request for global ban anyway because of someone's comments about Sidowpknbkhihj (Sidowpknbkhihj should be locked on all meta accounts and be banned from creating new accounts, along with his IP address and all his socks should be locked and prevented from account creation!) - which made me realize the extent of the Sidowpknbkhihj's conduct. Also, despite the global lock, one of their socks 台風14号 got away with it until it was found that it's a sock of Sidowpknbkhihj, which means a global lock will not be enough. BTW, i'll also post this on the village pump. SMB9 9thx uh~~kay!! 📸 09:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Advice request regarding bot[edit]

A while ago I wanted to upload pictures to a category concerning Göreme in Cappadocia, Turkey. To my amazement I found hundreds of pathetically bad pictures, imported from Flickr. They were the result of a day’s visit by some tourist from Taiwan, who travelled the region. Apart from the pictures being bad and silly (my opinion), they were all thrown into one (and later I found, two, the same collection was used twice) categories, whereas they were from many places all over the vast region. I wanted to get them out of the way, and created a category “Category:Göreme seen on the move” where I put these 310 pictures. Today I contemplated adding pictures to category “Category:Ancient Roman theatre in Hierapolis” and found another 256 pictures by the same tourist, totally overshadowing the pictures of the theatre itself. In both cases it seems the bot involved was User:FlickreviewR 2. I confess that many of the functions of bots are still unknown to me, and I myself often make mistakes. But I wonder if this bot does not cause more harm that benefits, dropping so many pictures in the wrong spots. I do not exclude that the bot itself is just following orders from earlier decisions in the process, but at least checking what it does seems to be a good idea. I intended to put this message in the discussion page of the bot, but then was redirected to a user whose text did not inspire me, Zhuyifei1999. Also, he/she seems not to be active anymore. That’s the reason I write here, as I wonder if the bot is still functioning. At the very least I’d like to be advised what to do if I again come across a collection like the one mentioned. Is it smart to “park” them in a category for that purpose, as I did with the Göreme pictures? Or? Dosseman (talk) 11:40, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

@Dosseman: User:FlickreviewR 2 nor User:Zhuyifei1999 did not upload images in Category:Göreme seen on the move, User:Mohammed Galib Hasan did. User:FlickreviewR 2 only verified that the license in the image matches the license on Flickr. I agree that the collection is not great quality photographs, but they are geo-coded and can serve as a backup photos in case we do not have better ones. The images were reasonably categorized, unlike many other large collections transferred from somewhere. Yes our categories always need maintenance and anything you can do to help with it will be appreciated, but I do not see any issue with this batch. You can even create "place by photographer" type categories if you want to separate them. --Jarekt (talk) 13:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

deleted[edit]

a Steward told me to ask this question here I would like this phrase deleted

Turkmen moved page User:Noël Redaelli to User:Louisette Ciliberto: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Noël Redaelli" to "Louisette Ciliberto"

because in this way we understand that a change has been made thanks--Mellvile (talk) 09:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

@Mellvile: Why you want that log entry to be deleted? -- CptViraj (talk) 09:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Logos of RWTH Aachen[edit]

Can some admin with a professional background in graphics design please have a look onto Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos RWTH Aachen and bring it to a decision? The case there is discussed in German; if you desire a translation into English please contact me. – Thanks for your effort! --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Done. I closed the request. Taivo (talk) 15:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Finalist Picture of the Year with content changed[edit]

WikiAviator (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user deleted 50% of the image. Picture used on Wikipedia. 115.84.96.230 02:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Done Reverted, user warned. --A.Savin 02:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File name change request[edit]

File:Kendra Sutherland at Exxxotica New Jersey 2015.jpg → File:Kendra Sunderland at Exxxotica New Jersey 2015.jpg

Category:Kendra Sutherland → Category:Kendra Sunderland

Because this is the real name of the actress.--103.104.30.148 02:35, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Done, Next time please use {{Rename}} for files and {{Move}} for categories. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 03:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Unable to delete a file[edit]

Hi, when I try to delete the File:Premium-Cola Flasche.jpg, I get the error mesage: Error deleting file: An unknown error occurred in storage backend "local-multiwrite". Any Ideas how to fix this? --Ju Ta 04:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Known issue. This file isn't the only one with this error, there are many. I've tagged the file with {{Deletion error}}. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:35, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

User:Leontin l[edit]

Like the year before at WLM Romania, this user refuses to place the photos in specific categories, which exist most of them, or, if not, to create new ones, so therefore he uploads a large amount of junk and others have to do this for him. At Commons we are all volunteers, not housemaids.Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 20:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

User is either a bot or incompetent[edit]

User:Cresmildo Manuel Muchiwa. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Done Indeffed - behavior on Wikidata shows this is cross-wiki nonsense. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Close request[edit]

Can a Commons admin look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pres. Kennedy at Rivier in 1960.jpg and close it? The last post was made over four months ago and no further clarification or evidence has been provided regarding the provenance of the photo. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Done Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Pi.1415926535. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Another lovely penis collection[edit]

Here. Please zap. --Palosirkka (talk) 09:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

They were uploaded 3 months ago. There's nothing wrong with following the normal DR process for this type of case. --Fæ (talk) 10:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

accidental removal of many files from a category through Cat-a-lot[edit]

Unfortunately I accidentally removed 194 files from the category Category:Hydraulics.

I asked about a possible revert mechanism on the Cat-a-lot discussion page but this page does not seem to receive much attention.

Should I wait for an answer or is there another reasonable way to fix the dilemma?

thanks-a-lot,

--KaiKemmann (talk) 11:57, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

@KaiKemmann:

Done, fixed. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 16:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

@KaiKemmann: (non-admin comment) For future reference, Cat-a-lot can be invoked from the list of your contributions. If this happens again, you can go to Special:Contributions/KaiKemmann, invoke Cat-a-lot, set the Cat-a-lot category to the one in question, select the problem changes, then add the entries to the category. Let me know on my talk page if you'd like more detailed instructions for this. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Brilliant. Big thanks to you both.

@Auntof6: I am sure that this information will be helpful to many a desperate Cat-a-lot novice in the times to come. Would you maybe consider documenting this revert mechanism on the Cat-a-lot help page as a reference to all users?

Dankeschön -- KaiKemmann (talk) 19:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Close a deletion discussion[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "Sky Brown" "UPROXX" has been open since May, and seems to have a consensus to delete. Is an admin able to look at this deletion request? Apologies if this is not the best venue, I'm mostly an English wiki user (these images were added to an article I created there). Joseph2302 (talk) 15:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Done I closed the DR as delete. --MGA73 (talk) 16:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)