Commons talk:Revision deletion

Adopt as policy

RevDel is an important enough tool that it should be covered by an official policy. I therefore propose adopting the current version as policy. This policy simply explains what RevDel is and documents the current RevDel practice. Suggestions to change the current practice are not part of this RFC (if necessary, start a new section below). Rd232 (talk) 03:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

 Support Adoption as policy. Mostly common sense clarification on how to use this tool. --Jarekt (talk) 03:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

 Support Seems reasonable (and similar to other project policies, a good sign of reasonableness) QU ^TalkQu 22:09, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

 Support Reasonable to me. --Túrelio (talk) 09:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

 Support, already de-facto policy. Jafeluv (talk) 13:00, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

 Support, Looks good, should be official policy. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:07, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

I support the policy, but I wonder about the use of the word "redact" and its variants in several places. It is not a word I would choose for a general English speaking audience. How many of our en-2 or en-3 colleagues will have to look it up? Yes, I see that it is linked, but should a word that we must link be part of official policy? How about "hidden from public view" at first reference and "hidden" thereafter?      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Fair point. I think "redacted" was used to distinguish from oversighting, where the material is completely hidden; but it's not really necessary. I've amended the page to remove the word. Rd232 (talk) 15:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

 Support Thanks.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:16, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

 Support looks reasonable --High Contrast (talk) 18:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

 Support. Definitely, this should be an official policy. Allan Aguilar (talk) 19:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

 Adopted Seems to be unanimous consensus, plus this has been open for one month. Techman224^Talk 19:17, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Edit request

{{Edit protected}} In the section "How to request revision deletion", the link to en:Streisand effect should be piped to only show "Streisand effect" without en:. darkweasel94 20:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done --Avenue (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Request for deletion for first version of file

Please, could someone delete the: first upload of the actual File:Lage-vorderburg(rüdesheim).png, as I did the image cut on the wrong tower. It should'nt stay in history and keeping rumor for mismatch. Thanks / br --Commander-pirx (talk) 14:46, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Fix Italics

{{Edit request}}

Can someone change: <s><i>struck through, greyed out, and in italics<i></s> to: <s><i>struck through, greyed out, and in italics</i></s> (it's just fixing the 2nd <i> by adding the /) Thanks. -- WOSlinker (talk) 00:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

 Done Awesome! Thank you! ~riley (talk) 06:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Policy template

{{Edit protected}}

Please replace

{{policy}}

by

{{TNT|policy}}

so that the notice appears in the local language on translated pages. Thanks --Hamilton Abreu (talk) 10:34, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Messed up

40px

I've messed up big time. I've uploaded a lot of different versions of these files because there were a lot of different sources. I've found the correct sources but the previous versions of the files are incorrect reconstructions and i am worried that in the future, someone could without knowledge revert them. I know this is a massive request, but can you delete all the versions that i've uploaded over those files exept the current ones. You should probably ask for help from another administrator so that you can do it faster if you take on the job.ХЕРАЛДИКА СССС (talk) 11:44, 17 November 2018 (UTC)